-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Changes to add NOAA-21 and GOES-18 radiances in monitor mode #636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 3 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -913,6 +913,7 @@ OBS_INPUT:: | |
| ahibufr ahi himawari8 ahi_himawari8 0.0 1 0 | ||
| abibufr abi g16 abi_g16 0.0 1 0 | ||
| abibufr abi g17 abi_g17 0.0 1 0 | ||
| abibufr abi g18 abi_g18 0.0 1 0 | ||
| rapidscatbufr uv null uv 0.0 0 0 | ||
| ompsnpbufr ompsnp npp ompsnp_npp 0.0 0 0 | ||
| ompslpbufr ompslp npp ompslp_npp 0.0 0 0 | ||
|
|
@@ -926,6 +927,8 @@ OBS_INPUT:: | |
| sstviirs viirs-m j1 viirs-m_j1 0.0 4 0 | ||
| ahibufr ahi himawari9 ahi_himawari9 0.0 1 0 | ||
| sstviirs viirs-m j2 viirs-m_j2 0.0 4 0 | ||
| atmsbufr21 atms n21 atms_n21 0.0 1 0 | ||
| crisfsbufr21 cris-fsr n21 cris-fsr_n21 0.0 1 0 | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ATMS N21 will be assimilated and the CrIS N21 is a place holder, correct?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I can not see the fix files from the github page. I believe that the use flag for ATMS N21 is set to 1, and the use flags for CrIS-fsr N21 and ABI-g18 are set to -1 I think we already made changes in abias and abias_pc for the three sensors in v16.3. implementation.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @emilyhcliu, I cloned @ADCollard , the PR description indicates that we should see changes in Should we also see a difference between cris-fsr_n21 weights when comparing
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks @RussTreadon-NOAA
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, both current operations, gfs.v16.3.9, and this PR maintain all channels of atms_n21, cris-fsr_n21, and abi_g18 in monitor mode. The only difference between
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @RussTreadon-NOAA @emilyhcliu Sorry, I was in a meeting. Yes, all three instruments need to be in monitor mode to facilitate bias correction spin-up.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RussTreadon-NOAA If there are no changes for |
||
| ompsnpbufr ompsnp n21 ompsnp_n21 0.0 0 0 | ||
| ompstcbufr ompstc8 n21 ompstc8_n21 0.0 2 0 | ||
| gomebufr gome metop-c gome_metop-c 0.0 2 0 | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will we assimilate ABI g18 clear-sky radiance?
Or, this is a place holder?