Enable CMAQ scavenging and wet removal in resolved clouds

[rmontuoro]

This PR enables CMAQ-provided simplistic scavenging and wet removal in resolved clouds to address issue #23.

A ufs-weather-model branch is available for testing purposes:

 git clone -b feature/aqm-rescld-wdep --recursive https://github.com/rmontuoro/ufs-weather-model

Note: This branch also includes changes to fv3atm enabling AOD output. A PR need to be created to merge such changes into the fv3atm develop branch.

Depends on NOAA-EMC/ufsatm/pull/593
Part of ufs-community/ufs-weather-model/pull/1456

[JianpingHuang-NOAA]

What is the difference between PRs#23 and #24?

[bbakernoaa]

@JianpingHuang-NOAA I don't see a PR#23

[JianpingHuang-NOAA]

A typo. It is issue 23#

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

@rmontuoro It looks like baselines are changing, is this expected?

baseline dir = /scratch1/NCEPDEV/nems/emc.nemspara/RT/NEMSfv3gfs/develop-20221007/INTEL/regional_atmaq
working dir  = /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Brian.Curtis/FV3_RT/rt_11339/regional_atmaq
Checking test 001 regional_atmaq results ....
 Comparing sfcf000.nc ............ALT CHECK......NOT OK
 Comparing sfcf003.nc ............ALT CHECK......NOT OK
 Comparing sfcf006.nc ............ALT CHECK......NOT OK
 Comparing atmf000.nc ............ALT CHECK......NOT OK
 Comparing atmf003.nc ............ALT CHECK......NOT OK
 Comparing atmf006.nc ............ALT CHECK......NOT OK
 Comparing RESTART/coupler.res .........OK
 Comparing RESTART/fv_core.res.nc .........OK
 Comparing RESTART/fv_core.res.tile1.nc .........OK
 Comparing RESTART/fv_srf_wnd.res.tile1.nc .........OK
 Comparing RESTART/fv_tracer.res.tile1.nc ............ALT CHECK......NOT OK
 Comparing RESTART/phy_data.nc .........OK
 Comparing RESTART/sfc_data.nc .........OK

[rmontuoro]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA - Yes. The AQM baseline (tracers) is expected to change since new physical processes are now enabled.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

@rmontuoro Do you mind if i merge in ytangnoaa's pt-source changes into this for getting 2 changes into UFSWM?

[rmontuoro]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA - I would like to review PR #18 before merging.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA - I would like to review PR #18 before merging.

@rmontuoro I will start testing with this PR w/o merging in AQM PR #18 at 2:00 if I don't hear back from you about reviewing AQM PR #18, and will work on AQM PR #18 tomorrow.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

@JianpingHuang-NOAA has asked me to hold on this PR as he talks with @rmontuoro about some issues.

[rmontuoro]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA - The latest updates reproduce bit-per-bit the results from @JianpingHuang-NOAA's original changes in the regional_atmaq regression test.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

Great, I may look to get this into tomorrow's UFSWM pr. As long as everything goes smoothly with the current UFSWM PR.

[rmontuoro]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA - PR #32 was merged into this PR.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

@bbakernoaa @JianpingHuang-NOAA Please provide a review of the code as we will merge this PR ASAP.

[bbakernoaa]

Like the option here