Combo UFS-dev PR #312 and #310#637
Conversation
|
Note that every RT changed results. This is unexpected. I will investigate, but I suspect it has to do with the new way of resetting the interstitial variables that may affect some output that gets written. |
|
After recreating baselines from main locally on my Mac, running RTs locally using the PR branch, I can replicate that all RTs are changing baselines. Further, I ran nccmp on one particular test and found the following: Variable Group Count Sum AbsSum Min Max Range Mean StdDev These variables had been being reset on radiation intervals and are now being reset with everything else, so the output will be different. This is expected after all, so I think that this PR is good to go. It's not actually changing the state, just how certain interstitial variables are being written out. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes look consistent with NOAA-EMC/ufsatm#1004.
@grantfirl if the differences from the baselines look good to you, it works for me. Thanks for testing and looking into that!
SOURCE: @grantfirl
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:
ISSUE: None
ASSOCIATED PRs:
NCAR/ccpp-physics#1173
TESTS CONDUCTED: SCM RTs
This PR catches the NCAR:main branch up with changes from the ufs-community:ufs/dev branch.
Associated ufs/dev PR:
Associated ufsatm PR:
Associated NCAR PR:
REGRESSION TEST CHANGES: Supposed to be none.