Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Allow cross region PrivateLink connections #30897

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bobbyiliev
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

if !connection_az
.chars()
.all(|c| c.is_ascii_alphanumeric() || c == '-')
|| !connection_az.contains("-az")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems like we could tighten this up to be more precise. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/using-regions-availability-zones.html#az-ids has more details on the structure

the most legit solution would be to automatically pull every AZ ID from the partition we're operating in during our Pulumi run and then plumbing it 20 layers deep to here... in practice I think just ensuring we're following the structure in the doc above is sufficient

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(and if we pull out some logic to validate the ids, we should add a quick unit test)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants