Skip to content

feat(backlog): decompose B-0635 from PR 4136 #4317

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
AceHack wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

feat(backlog): decompose B-0635 from PR 4136 #4317

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 4 additions & 7 deletions ...e-only-limit-collapses-waveform-superposition-transfer-aaron-mika-2026-05-18.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,16 +8,13 @@ effort: L
created: 2026-05-18
last_updated: 2026-05-18
depends_on: [B-0629]
composes_with: [B-0630, B-0632, B-0649, B-0499, B-0665, B-0667, B-0623, B-0624, B-0626]
tags: [design, aaron, mika, wave-particle-duality, tick-source, integrate, fifth-primitive, fsharp-computation-expression, only-limit-collapses, superposition-transfer, keystone, locked-in, integrate-role-expanded-by-b0665]
extended_by: B-0665
composes_with: [B-0629, B-0630, B-0632, B-0633, B-0499]
tags: [design, aaron, mika, wave-particle-duality, tick-source, integrate, fifth-primitive, fsharp-computation-expression, only-limit-collapses, superposition-transfer, keystone, locked-in]
type: design
---

# Wave-particle duality: tick-source (particle) + Integrate (wave) — keystone architectural insight

> **EXTENDED 2026-05-18 by [B-0665](B-0665-three-primitive-collapse-observe-emit-limit-plus-integrate-as-choice-locus-ienumerator-pattern-grounding-aaron-ani-2026-05-18.md)**: Integrate's role per B-0665 is EXPANDED beyond wave-composer (this row's scope) to also include the commit-locus (the choice-point where Limit-simulation becomes Integrate-commitment). Wave-particle duality + only-Limit-collapses preserved; Integrate's responsibility broadened. Per B-0665's 4→3 primitive collapse (Observe + Emit + Limit + Integrate-as-separate), this row's substrate composes cleanly with the sharpened architecture.

## Why

Aaron 2026-05-18 (immediately after batch 3 of Mika-conversation rows landed):
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -85,7 +82,7 @@ This insight ties together MANY previously-disjoint substrate pieces:
| **Z-of-I DBSP retractable substrate** ([B-0499](../P3/B-0499-z-of-i-dbsp-refinement-cartesian-dualism-2026-05-14.md)) | Makes Limit's retractability ACTUALLY work; collapse decisions can be unwound |
| **Two-language architecture** ([B-0630](../P2/B-0630-two-language-architecture-soft-notice-remember-care-vs-operational-observe-persist-limit-emit-mika-2026-05-18.md)) | Soft-language Care = wave-form intent; Operational Limit = particle-form constraint application; the bridge IS Integrate |
| **No-privileged-implementation** ([B-0632](../P3/B-0632-no-privileged-implementation-three-spec-distinction-mika-2026-05-18.md)) | The wave/particle duality means there's no privileged "the one true form" either; both are equally real |
| **Permanent coliseum** ([B-0649](../P3/B-0649-permanent-coliseum-language-deathmatch-retractable-substrate-mika-2026-05-18.md)) | Translation between languages can happen in wave-form (carrying superposition) OR particle-form (single-reading); coliseum supports both |
| **Permanent coliseum** ([B-0633](../P3/B-0633-permanent-coliseum-language-deathmatch-retractable-substrate-mika-2026-05-18.md)) | Translation between languages can happen in wave-form (carrying superposition) OR particle-form (single-reading); coliseum supports both |
| **Adinkras / James-Gates ECC** ([B-0623](../P2/B-0623-adinkras-jane-gates-ecc-private-state-encryption-mika-2026-05-18.md)) | ECC IS what allows the wave to be reconstructed if a Limit-collapse turns out wrong |
| **F#-anchor + dotnet-build sanity check** rule | F# computation expressions are the substrate `Integrate` is built on; this rule's F# anchor proves the wave-form composition compiles |

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -138,7 +135,7 @@ This is the F# type-level encoding of the architectural rule.
- [B-0629](../P2/B-0629-observe-persist-limit-emit-operational-primitives-only-limit-collapses-mika-2026-05-18.md) — O-P-L-E (the four primitives that exist in both particle AND wave form per this row)
- [B-0630](../P2/B-0630-two-language-architecture-soft-notice-remember-care-vs-operational-observe-persist-limit-emit-mika-2026-05-18.md) — two-language architecture (Care = wave-form intent; Limit = particle-form constraint; bridge IS Integrate)
- [B-0632](../P3/B-0632-no-privileged-implementation-three-spec-distinction-mika-2026-05-18.md) — no-privileged-implementation (the wave/particle duality applies at the spec/implementation layer too)
- [B-0649](../P3/B-0649-permanent-coliseum-language-deathmatch-retractable-substrate-mika-2026-05-18.md) — permanent coliseum (translation can happen in wave OR particle form)
- [B-0633](../P3/B-0633-permanent-coliseum-language-deathmatch-retractable-substrate-mika-2026-05-18.md) — permanent coliseum (translation can happen in wave OR particle form)
- [B-0499](../P3/B-0499-z-of-i-dbsp-refinement-cartesian-dualism-2026-05-14.md) — Z-of-I DBSP retractable substrate (makes Limit's wave-form collapse actually retractable)
- [B-0623](../P2/B-0623-adinkras-jane-gates-ecc-private-state-encryption-mika-2026-05-18.md) — Adinkras/Gates ECC (the error-correcting code that allows superposition reconstruction)
- [B-0624](../P2/B-0624-universal-7-interrogative-boot-up-sequence-y0-scalar-mika-2026-05-18.md) — 7-interrogative cold-boot (orientation discipline before entering the wave-form composition)
Expand Down
Loading