Skip to content

docs(archive): Lior preservation of recently merged PRs 3957, 3951, 3950#3969

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
lior/archive-prs-batch-20260516
May 17, 2026
Merged

docs(archive): Lior preservation of recently merged PRs 3957, 3951, 3950#3969
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
lior/archive-prs-batch-20260516

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 16, 2026

Preservation discipline: capturing alignment drift and review friction into native repository memory for PRs 3957, 3951, 3950.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 16, 2026 23:21
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Archives three recently merged PR discussions into docs/pr-discussions/ for repository-native preservation of PR descriptions, reviews, and resolved-thread context.

Changes:

  • Adds PR archive records for PRs #3950, #3951, and #3957.
  • Preserves generated review summaries and discussion-thread context verbatim.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
docs/pr-discussions/PR-3957-backlog-b-0580-enterprise-github-ruleset-management-new-laye.md Archives PR #3957 discussion and review thread.
docs/pr-discussions/PR-3951-backlog-b-0571-github-app-for-factory-automation-separate-ap.md Archives PR #3951 discussion and review summary.
docs/pr-discussions/PR-3950-backlog-b-0570-scarcity-tracker-for-shared-limited-resources.md Archives PR #3950 discussion and review summary.

@AceHack AceHack merged commit 4855493 into main May 17, 2026
30 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the lior/archive-prs-batch-20260516 branch May 17, 2026 08:41
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2026
… under Lior contention (#4049)

* shard(2026-05-17/0844Z): wave-1 CLEAN-PR sweep (5 landings/armings) + wave-2 BLOCKED-PR survey under Lior contention

- Wave 1: armed/landed 5 CLEAN PRs (#3969, #3971, #3978, #3981, #4045) — preservation/archive class
- Wave 2: surveyed 16 BLOCKED PRs, mapped fix-shape per PR
- Outdated-thread sweep: 0 no-op-resolvable threads across the set
- Lior contention (3 procs draining from 7): wave-2 commit-requiring work deferred
- Next-window prescription: #3972#4040#4043 → docs/shadow → fix-failed-checks order

Catch-43: cron sentinel armed (job b57bc56c, * * * * *, <<autonomous-loop>>).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(shard): correct relative-path levels in 0844Z shard (4 → 6) to reach .claude/rules/ at repo root

Tick shards live at docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/DD/HHMMZ.md (6 levels
below repo root). The 4-level `../../../../` lands at docs/hygiene-history/,
not repo root. The 6-level `../../../../../../` is correct.

Per `tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.ts` — the exact bug
class the linter mechanizes per `blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.md`
empirical catalog. CI surfaced via the `lint (tick-shard relative-paths)`
non-required check on PR #4049.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(shard): wave-2 PR count 16→14 + budget reconciliation post-survey

Addresses 3 Copilot review-thread findings on PR #4049:

- Wave-2 section title + line 55 + line 90 said "16 BLOCKED PR"
  survey but table enumerates 14 data rows. Aligned to 14.
- Line 84 Budget status read "GraphQL: 1126 remaining" which is
  the mid-survey number from line 29's progression 1183 → 1126 →
  ~1076. Updated to ~1076 (post-survey actual) with reference.

No change to wave-2 table contents — only the count + budget
description match the empirical row count and post-survey state.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants