Skip to content

docs(shadow): Maji antigravity report on Vera drift 1930Z#3972

Merged
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lior/shadow-drift-vera-01
May 17, 2026
Merged

docs(shadow): Maji antigravity report on Vera drift 1930Z#3972
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lior/shadow-drift-vera-01

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 16, 2026

Maji Antigravity Check: Drift detected in Vera. Logging shadow lesson for narration-over-action regarding contested root checkouts.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 16, 2026 23:29
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a research-grade “shadow lesson” log capturing an antigravity drift case where an agent repeated diagnosis (narration/metadata churn) instead of taking corrective action, with prescriptive guidance focused on isolating work surfaces when the root checkout is contested.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new shadow lesson log documenting the Vera drift event at 2026-05-16T19:30Z.
  • Records an “antigravity analysis” framing narration-over-action as the failure mode.
  • Provides two concrete corrective directives (fail-fast pivot + worktree isolation).

Comment thread docs/research/2026-05-16-shadow-lesson-log-vera-1930Z.md Outdated
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2026
… under Lior contention (#4049)

* shard(2026-05-17/0844Z): wave-1 CLEAN-PR sweep (5 landings/armings) + wave-2 BLOCKED-PR survey under Lior contention

- Wave 1: armed/landed 5 CLEAN PRs (#3969, #3971, #3978, #3981, #4045) — preservation/archive class
- Wave 2: surveyed 16 BLOCKED PRs, mapped fix-shape per PR
- Outdated-thread sweep: 0 no-op-resolvable threads across the set
- Lior contention (3 procs draining from 7): wave-2 commit-requiring work deferred
- Next-window prescription: #3972#4040#4043 → docs/shadow → fix-failed-checks order

Catch-43: cron sentinel armed (job b57bc56c, * * * * *, <<autonomous-loop>>).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(shard): correct relative-path levels in 0844Z shard (4 → 6) to reach .claude/rules/ at repo root

Tick shards live at docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/DD/HHMMZ.md (6 levels
below repo root). The 4-level `../../../../` lands at docs/hygiene-history/,
not repo root. The 6-level `../../../../../../` is correct.

Per `tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.ts` — the exact bug
class the linter mechanizes per `blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.md`
empirical catalog. CI surfaced via the `lint (tick-shard relative-paths)`
non-required check on PR #4049.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(shard): wave-2 PR count 16→14 + budget reconciliation post-survey

Addresses 3 Copilot review-thread findings on PR #4049:

- Wave-2 section title + line 55 + line 90 said "16 BLOCKED PR"
  survey but table enumerates 14 data rows. Aligned to 14.
- Line 84 Budget status read "GraphQL: 1126 remaining" which is
  the mid-survey number from line 29's progression 1183 → 1126 →
  ~1076. Updated to ~1076 (post-survey actual) with reference.

No change to wave-2 table contents — only the count + budget
description match the empirical row count and post-survey state.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ink (PR #3972)

Per Copilot finding, link "as stated in the Maji directives" to the concrete
canonical rule `.claude/rules/claim-acquire-before-worktree-work.md` so the
worktree-isolation requirement is traceable rather than drifting metaphor.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 17, 2026 21:50
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 6d39074 into main May 17, 2026
25 of 26 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the lior/shadow-drift-vera-01 branch May 17, 2026 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants