memory(feedback): audit-backlog-status-drift sub-class catalog from 2026-05-16 session

[AceHack]

Forced-escalation pure-git substrate work (counter at #6; GraphQL was 0/5000).

After ~13 autonomous-loop ticks of audit-triage on 2026-05-16, the disposition space stabilized into:

• 7 primary classes: deps: Bump FsUnit.xUnit from 7.1.0 to 7.1.1 #1, Round 26 — rename tail, §18 memory clarification, three dispatches #2, Round 26 — rename tail, §18 memory clarification, three dispatches #2-SD, Round 27 — plugin API + governance split + memory-in-repo #3, Round 28 — FsCheck LawRunner (Option B) + round-29 CI anchor #4, FP-2, FP-3
• 4 sub-class overlays: deps: Bump FsUnit.xUnit from 7.1.0 to 7.1.1 #1-Ready, deps: Bump FsUnit.xUnit from 7.1.0 to 7.1.1 #1-DepBlocked, Round 26 — rename tail, §18 memory clarification, three dispatches #2-Ready, Round 26 — rename tail, §18 memory clarification, three dispatches #2-Execution-atom

Each instance from the session catalogued (21 rows) with row → class mapping. Future-Otto cold-boot inherits the taxonomy directly rather than re-deriving it across another ~13-tick arc.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3656acdb06

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds a new feedback memory documenting the 2026-05-16 audit-backlog-status-drift taxonomy so future agents can reuse the observed drift/partial/false-positive classifications.

Changes:

• Adds a new memory file with frontmatter and empirical class catalog.
• Documents primary classes, overlay sub-classes, session instances, and future auto-classifier ideas.
• Cross-references related audit tooling, backlog rows, and prior memory files.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

memory/feedback_audit_backlog_status_drift_sub_class_catalog_otto_cli_2026_05_16.md:54

• This row records only the overlay class, but the taxonomy defines overlays as orthogonal to a primary class and the other overlay examples include both (for example #2 + #2-Ready). Recording B-0457 as just #1-DepBlocked loses the primary #1 classification that future triage would need.

| B-0457 | **#1-DepBlocked** | Amara core; depends on B-0462 (vendor-bias gap) |

memory/feedback_audit_backlog_status_drift_sub_class_catalog_otto_cli_2026_05_16.md:61

• B-0443 is still status: open in docs/backlog/P2/B-0443-..., and this note also says the close-row PR was only pending in the deferred queue. Marking the instance #1 (CLOSED) makes the catalog claim closure before it has landed.

| B-0443 | #1 (CLOSED) | Launch-substrate carve-out; closed via PR pending in deferred queue this session |

memory/feedback_audit_backlog_status_drift_sub_class_catalog_otto_cli_2026_05_16.md:140

• This says three close-row PRs landed, but the parenthetical immediately lists only one merged PR plus one aborted attempt and one deferred-queue close-row. That overstates the session outcome and conflicts with the instance table above.

Three close-row PRs landed (B-0037.1 → #3859 MERGED; B-0049.2
attempt aborted; B-0443 close-row in deferred queue). The remaining

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.