shard(tick): 2026-05-16T07:58Z — B-0272 closed (10th pure-drift; 50% audit milestone)#3823
shard(tick): 2026-05-16T07:58Z — B-0272 closed (10th pure-drift; 50% audit milestone)#3823AceHack wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…audit-backlog triaged) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 80dd9075dd
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| Across 19 triaged candidates: | ||
|
|
||
| - **10 pure-drift (53%)** — work shipped, status flag never flipped | ||
| - **5 partial/multi-slice (26%)** — needs annotation OR self-documenting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The rate summary says this is “Across 19 triaged candidates,” but the three bullets currently total only 18 (10 + 5 + 3), and that conflicts with the tally table above (19) where non-pure/non-FP classes add up to 6, not 5. This introduces a factual inconsistency in the audit record and can skew downstream interpretation of drift rates and backlog progress; please update the bucket count/percentage so the breakdown sums to the stated 19-candidate sample.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a hygiene-history tick shard recording the 2026-05-16T07:58Z backlog drift-audit milestone, including the B-0272 pure-drift closure and audit progress totals.
Changes:
- Adds a new tick log for the 07:58Z session.
- Records B-0272 acceptance verification and closure provenance.
- Updates drift-audit progress and visibility notes.
| Across 19 triaged candidates: | ||
|
|
||
| - **10 pure-drift (53%)** — work shipped, status flag never flipped | ||
| - **5 partial/multi-slice (26%)** — needs annotation OR self-documenting |
…%); Codex + Copilot both flagged math drift
…rebase Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
|
Closing as redundant — the Per |
Pull request was closed
…r critique on #3881 (#3892) Brief tick. Substrate landed as PR review comment on #3881 (Lior's antigravity-check claiming #3823 closure was metadata churn). Agreed on the general pattern; disagreed on #3823 specifically (substantive queue maintenance); opened future- substrate question about per-tick cadence amendment. This shard exists per tick-must-never-stop Step 4; intentionally short. Future amendment may add "shard-if-substantive" branch. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…#3823 closed + #3817 deferred (#3883) * shard(tick): 2026-05-16T13:31Z — stale-armed-PR triage: #3871 merged + #3823 closed + #3817 deferred Continuing investigation-then-act discipline from 13:10Z tick: - #3871 (12:07Z+12:11Z bundle) self-resolved + merged - #3823 closed as redundant (0758Z.md already on main) - #3817 deferred (BACKLOG.md conflict needs manual rebase) No multi-Otto contamination this tick. Audit cycle 38/38 holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: MD032 blank-line before list in 1331Z.md line 25 Same FP class as #3894's lint fix. Adds blank line after the 'Either:' lead-in. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
10th pure-drift close (B-0272). 19/38 audit candidates triaged (50%). Pure-drift rate ~53% stable.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code