Skip to content

shard(tick): 0524Z — PR #3361/#3362 merged + worktree-prune-race investigation cleared 4 standard agent loops#3365

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
shard/tick-0524z-otto-cli-2026-05-15
May 15, 2026
Merged

shard(tick): 0524Z — PR #3361/#3362 merged + worktree-prune-race investigation cleared 4 standard agent loops#3365
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
shard/tick-0524z-otto-cli-2026-05-15

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 15, 2026

Summary

  • PR #3361 (0503Z shard) MERGED → 21299d5
  • PR #3362 (B-0529 backlog row) MERGED → c6f2620
  • PR shard(tick): 0517Z — bus hygiene + B-0529 filed + restraint discipline on B-0527 advisory #3363 (0517Z shard) still in CI, auto-merge armed
  • Worktree-prune-race investigation: 4 standard agent loops cleared (Lior, Riven, Codex/Vera, Copilot) + tools/lanes/lane-allocator.ts + git worktree prune + git gc.pruneexpire. Source untraced; narrowed candidate list documented.
  • B-0527 collision unchanged; restraint discipline maintained (no third advisory republish).

Test plan

  • bun tools/hygiene/check-tick-history-shard-schema.ts → 0 violations
  • bun x markdownlint-cli2 → 0 violations
  • Pipe-row first line + H1-rich body (hybrid pattern per B-0529)
  • Linked rule refs to full .claude/rules/... paths
  • CI required checks pass on PR
  • Auto-merge fires after CI green

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…estigation cleared 4 standard agent loops

Negative-finding substrate: cleared Lior, Riven, Codex/Vera, Copilot loops + lane-allocator + git worktree prune
+ git gc.pruneexpire as suspects for the worktree-pruning race observed in tick 0414Z. Source remains untraced;
remaining candidates (claude-loop, otto-forward, peer-Otto, .git/hooks/, macOS system services) listed for
next-tick investigation. Investigation-budget discipline: 12 tool calls; diminishing returns; next-tick continuation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 05:35
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 15, 2026 05:35
@AceHack AceHack merged commit dc28f7d into main May 15, 2026
23 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the shard/tick-0524z-otto-cli-2026-05-15 branch May 15, 2026 05:36
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds the 2026-05-15 05:24Z tick-history shard documenting merges of PRs #3361/#3362 and capturing the current state of the worktree-prune-race investigation (including cleared suspects and remaining candidates).

Changes:

  • Introduces a new tick shard file 0524Z.md with the required pipe-row header plus an H1-rich narrative body.
  • Records investigation results for the worktree-prune-race incident and enumerates remaining suspects for follow-up.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/15/0524Z.md:58

  • The markdown link to .claude/rules/verify-before-deferring.md uses ../../../../../..., which appears to be one directory short from this file location and will resolve to a non-existent docs/.claude/... path. Update the link to a correct relative (or repo-root-relative) path.
This composes with [`.claude/rules/verify-before-deferring.md`](../../../../../.claude/rules/verify-before-deferring.md) — instead of writing "next tick I'll investigate this", THIS tick did partial investigation and recorded which candidates are now cleared.

Comment on lines +52 to +58
The investigation consumed roughly 12 tool calls this tick. Per [`.claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md`](../../../../../.claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md), this is a real substantive activity (NOT Holding). However, returns-on-investigation-budget diminish quickly: each cleared candidate narrows the suspect space by maybe 15%, and the remaining-candidates list still has ~6 entries. The remaining inspection effort would be best targeted to higher-likelihood candidates (peer-Otto and `.git/hooks/`) in a future tick.

### Negative-finding substrate is still substrate

Some investigations land "we ruled out N candidates". That IS substrate-honest progress — the suspect space is smaller, future-Otto starts narrower. Not every tick lands a positive answer; the discipline is to write down WHAT WAS RULED OUT so the next tick doesn't re-trace.

This composes with [`.claude/rules/verify-before-deferring.md`](../../../../../.claude/rules/verify-before-deferring.md) — instead of writing "next tick I'll investigate this", THIS tick did partial investigation and recorded which candidates are now cleared.
| Lior loop (`.gemini/bin/lior-loop-tick.ts`) | yes | CLEARED — no `rm -rf` / `rmSync` on worktree paths; only `git worktree add` |
| Riven loop (`.cursor/bin/riven-loop-tick.ts`) | yes | CLEARED — `rmSync` only on its own lock dir |
| Codex/Vera loop (`.codex/bin/codex-loop-tick.ts`) | yes | CLEARED — `rmSync` only on its own lock dir |
| Copilot loop (`.copilot/bin/copilot-loop-tick.ts`) | yes | CLEARED — `rmSync` only on its own lock dir |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants