shard(tick): 2018Z — 39-candidate manual triage via 9-variant taxonomy#3220
Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intoMay 14, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Used the audit-rule-cross-refs tool shipped this session (PR #3202) to produce 39 stale-pointer candidates, then applied the 9-variant taxonomy manually to triage each. Result: 37 healthy variants + 2 entries pointing at the 1 real defect (B-0514's missing wwjd-grey-honest memory file, already captured). False-positive rate: 38/39 = 97%. Layer A is high-recall + low-precision; Layer B semantic classification is genuinely load-bearing. Reproduces the 12-batch manual audit's conclusion (217/218 = 99.5% LIVE, 1 defect) via the tool + manual taxonomy application. Mechanization confidence high. Bonus: Layer B heuristics for each variant noted in shard "Notes for future-Otto" section — LLM-or-regex tractable for next mechanization slice. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
deleted the
shard/tick-2018Z-39-candidate-triage-otto-cli-2026-05-14
branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new hygiene-history tick shard documenting the manual triage of audit-rule-cross-refs.ts output using the established 9-variant taxonomy, including counts and “future mechanization” heuristics.
Changes:
- Add a 2026-05-14 20:18Z tick shard capturing 39-candidate classification results.
- Record variant-specific heuristics intended to inform a future Layer B mechanization pass.
Comment on lines
+1
to
+3
| # Tick 2026-05-14T20:18Z — 39-candidate manual triage via 9-variant taxonomy | ||
|
|
||
| ## Refresh (step 1) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ran the audit-rule-cross-refs tool (PR #3202) + applied the 9-variant taxonomy manually to all 39 candidates.
Result: 37 healthy variants + 2 entries pointing at the 1 real defect (B-0514, already captured).
False-positive rate: 38/39 = 97% — Layer A is high-recall + low-precision; Layer B semantic classification is genuinely load-bearing. The 9-variant taxonomy was the right artifact.
Bonus: Layer B heuristics for each variant (LLM-or-regex tractable) noted in the shard's "Notes for future-Otto" section.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
EOF
)