shard(tick): 1804Z — razor-cadence composes-with audit (4 newest rules, 30/30 LIVE)#3152
Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intoMay 14, 2026
Conversation
…s, 30/30 LIVE Razor-cadence issue #3128 item 4 (composes-with audit) on the 4 most-recently-added rules: autonomous-loop-per-tick-pointer.md, otto-channels-reference-card.md, holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md, claim-acquire-before-worktree-work.md. 24 file references + 6 backlog rows = 30/30 LIVE. No stale pointers. Per-tick razor-pass shape established: item 4 is the lowest-effort highest-clarity checklist item (mechanical existence checks; clean binary result; immediate stale- pointer surfacing). Items 1+2+3+5 remain for follow-up ticks. Real-dependency-wait state: PR #3150 (Manifesto V2 §33 archive, 4 required checks in progress, auto-merge armed by Aaron); parallel Otto on B-0442 (claimed 18:02:32Z). Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
deleted the
shard/tick-1804Z-razor-cadence-composes-with-audit-2026-05-14
branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a single tick shard documenting the 18:04Z hygiene tick that performed the composes-with audit (item 4 of razor-cadence #3128) over the four most recently added .claude/rules/ files, recording 30/30 cross-references LIVE.
Changes:
- New tick shard at
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1804Z.mdcapturing the per-tick 7-step autonomous-loop discipline output.
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…e memory clarifier) Codex + Copilot both flagged a missing memory-file reference in the Manifesto V2 §33 archive. Root cause: cited filename was missing the `_dbsp_clifford_` suffix AND the sentence elided the user-scope-vs-repo distinction so reviewers read it as a broken in-tree reference. Fix landed at bfa74d1 on PR #3150 branch: 1. Filename corrected 2. Explicit Note paragraph added clarifying that `feedback_*.md` files live in ~/.claude/projects/-Users-acehack-Documents-src-repos-Zeta/memory/ (NOT in the repo) Both threads resolved via GraphQL resolveReviewThread mutation. PR #3152 (prior tick razor-cadence shard) now CLEAN, autoMerge armed for merge. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
5 tasks
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…#3161) Continues the per-tick razor-cadence composes-with audit pattern established in PR #3152. Batch 2 rules: zeta-ships-with-skills-immediate-value.md, dv2-data-split-discipline- activated.md, methodology-hard-limits.md, shadow-check-name-acceptance.md. 17 rule refs + 13 memory refs + 7 backlog rows = 37/37 LIVE. Combined with batch 1 (PR #3152): 67/67 LIVE across 8 newest rules (~17% of 47 total .claude/rules/ files now have clean composes-with audit). Razor-cadence issue #3128 item 4 progress; items 1+2+3+5 require deeper rule-content read and remain for future ticks. Substrate observation worth carrying: rule files reference memory via bare 'memory/' prefix (repo-scope, 889 feedback files); §33 research archives need explicit user- scope qualifier (per PR #3150 1808Z fix). The convention split is now load-bearing and stable. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced May 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Tick shard for 2026-05-14T18:04Z.
Razor-cadence issue #3128 item 4 (composes-with audit) executed on the 4 most-recently-added
.claude/rules/files:autonomous-loop-per-tick-pointer.md(#3042)otto-channels-reference-card.md(#3041)holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md(#3029)claim-acquire-before-worktree-work.md(#3032)Result: 24 file references LIVE + 6 backlog rows LIVE = 30/30 cross-references survive the audit. No stale pointers.
Why this work
PR #3150 (Manifesto V2 §33 archive) is in real-dependency-wait (4 required checks in-progress, auto-merge armed by Aaron). Per
never-be-idle: pick parallel speculative work. Razor-cadence issue #3128 has been open since 11:21Z asking for a 5-item audit pass; item 4 is the lowest-effort highest-clarity checklist item (mechanical existence checks; clean binary result).Substrate notes
Per-tick razor-pass shape established: item 4 = pick 3-5 newest rules → audit cross-references → shard the result. Repeatable on future ticks. Items 1 (operational form), 2 (dialectical-unfalsifiability), 3 (mechanization audit), 5 (MEMORY.md index audit) need deeper read of rule contents themselves and are deferred to follow-up ticks.
Test plan
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1804Z.md<<autonomous-loop>>, every minute)🤖 Generated with Claude Code