-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[QUESTION] Memory consumption seems high #470
Comments
Heya @DennisGaida, In the meantime, you can serve up the static files yourself with NGINX or similar web server (here's an example: Dockerfile). Only downside is that the server-side endpoints (update config, status check, and proxy widget results) will not work, and you currently won't be able to modify config. Going to close this as a duplicate, but if you've got a mem dump, or more info that shows there's a bug, or if the memory has massively spiked between versions, then this would be a bug, so feel free to reopen. |
Thank you for answering this @Lissy93! I'm sure it is node, I just thought that maybe there was something to make it leaner. Looking forward to the lite version - I'll keep running the current version w/o nginx since 250MB isn't too bad, but I was still wondering where all that memory goes. |
Well lite version should happen soon then because in recent versions it has been growing to roughly 465 MB. |
Environment
Self-Hosted (Docker)
Version
2.0.1
Describe the problem
Checking my docker stack, dashy is almost the highest consumer of RAM/memory with currently 255MB assigned to it. I'm just wondering whether this is "normal"? Dashy ultimately is a static HTML page being served and I believe that is a bit much RAM for a HTML page...
Am I missing some caching mechanism I haven't activated? I haven't restarted the container no, so maybe I'm experiencing a memory leak?
Additional info
No response
Please tick the boxes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: