Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 14, 2022. It is now read-only.

Add new coincheck wallet to known.json - Closes #588 #589

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 3, 2018

Conversation

Nazgolze
Copy link
Contributor

What was the problem?

known.json needed an update to identify 16293716040102736949L

How did I fix it?

added the entry for 16293716040102736949L

Review checklist

  • The PR solves Update Top Accounts #588
  • All new code is covered with unit tests
  • All new features are covered with e2e tests
  • All new code follows best practices

known.json Outdated
@@ -13,11 +13,12 @@
"14175575863689886451L" : { "owner": "Adviser Assets", "description": "LiskHQ" },
"5726759782318848681L" : { "owner": "Lisk Foundation", "description": "LiskHQ" },
"15841793714384967784L" : { "owner": "Lisk Community Assets", "description": "LiskHQ" },
"3040783849904107057L" : { "owner": "Coincheck.com", "description": "Old Wallet" },
"3040783849904107057L" : { "owner": "Coincheck.com", "description": "Old old Wallet" },
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm open to wording this differently 😅

Copy link
Contributor

@MichalTuleja MichalTuleja Apr 26, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not an expert in the English language, but wouldn't just Former (hot/cold/main) wallet sound better? :)
Also, it would make sense to merge that change with the branch 1.6.1. It seems to be released sooner than 2.0.0 and it'll be part of 2.1.0 in the future.

@MichalTuleja MichalTuleja self-assigned this Apr 26, 2018
@MichalTuleja MichalTuleja changed the title Add new coincheck wallet to known.json Add new coincheck wallet to known.json - Closes #588 Apr 26, 2018
@MichalTuleja MichalTuleja merged commit 6b2c2b4 into 2.0.0 May 3, 2018
@MichalTuleja MichalTuleja deleted the 588-topaccounts-update branch May 3, 2018 13:05
@MichalTuleja
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if it is merged with 1.6.1 as well.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants