-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add testing for PyTorch 2.4 (Fabric) #20028
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #20028 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 71% 59% -12%
=========================================
Files 427 422 -5
Lines 35460 35362 -98
=========================================
- Hits 25234 20754 -4480
- Misses 10226 14608 +4382 |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
…ghtning into tests/pytorch-2.4-fabric
⚡ Required checks status: All passing 🟢Groups summary🟢 pytorch_lightning: Tests workflow
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Azure GPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Benchmarks
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 fabric: Docs
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Docker
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_fabric: CPU workflowThese checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_fabric: Azure GPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 mypy
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 installThese checks are required after the changes to Thank you for your contribution! 💜
|
4f92d45
to
116fec6
Compare
What does this PR do?
Adds PyTorch 2.4 RC to the testing matrix of Fabric (PyTorch Lightning in follow up).
Notes:
state_dict
APIs are emitting FutureWarnings/deprecation warnings. It will be a greater effort to switch to the new ones (the ModelParallelStrategy already uses the new ones) and provide backward compatibility for older PyTorch versions. So we're not doing it in this PR.cc @carmocca @Borda @justusschock @awaelchli