Skip to content

docs(wave-44): plan close-out wave targeting 396/402 -> 402/402 - #367

Closed
KooshaPari wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
feat/sl-w44-plan
Closed

docs(wave-44): plan close-out wave targeting 396/402 -> 402/402#367
KooshaPari wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
feat/sl-w44-plan

Conversation

@KooshaPari

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Wave-44 plan artifacts: top-level scope + PERT + CHANGELOG entry.
Closes out the 6 unpaid residuals carried from Wave-43 (396/402 98% A
held conservative).

What changed

File Lines Purpose
WAVE44_SCOPE.md +70 Top-level scope: 6 lanes ranked, ownership breakdown, decision points, carry-over history
docs/ops/WAVE44_PERT.md +110 PERT: activity table, merge order, acceptance stubs, risk register
CHANGELOG.md +2 Unreleased Changed entry for Wave-44 plan

Total: 3 files, +182 lines.

Lane disposition

3 machine-executable (loom SSE soak, fluent tooling, corpus breadth)

  • 3 human-gated (Windows allocator prod rollout, brew/winget signing keys,
    in-tree KMS vs PII redaction).

Decision points

  • D-W44-1: Pick R-4 branch (L22 KMS vs L24 PII redaction). Recommend L22.
  • D-W44-2: R-3 keys window — partial close fallback to W45.
  • D-W44-3: Accept partial W44-B5 close if loc sign-off slips.

Score target

Pre-W44: 396/402 (98% A)
Target: 402/402 (100% A+)
Realistic: 398–401/402 (human gates may slip)

Predecessor

Wave-43-D reaudit PR #366 MERGED @ 06:01:29Z (commit 41829e8).

Refs: WAVE43_SCOPE.md, WAVE43_PERT.md, PR #366

KooshaPari added 13 commits July 22, 2026 19:18
- SCORECARD.md: header refreshed (date/auditor/commit), Wave-43 Delta section
  added, Wave-41/42/43 line, Held (no score) expansion incl #348/#349/#361/#362,
  Remaining unpaid rewrite.
- TRACEABILITY.json: updated 2026-07-21 -> 2026-07-23; commit d5f999f -> 41829e8;
  wave Wave-42 -> Wave-43; +delta_vs_w42 note. CRLF preserved.
- GAP_QA_MATRIX.md: C00 row + PLAN-W8-B row updated.
- CHANGELOG.md: Unreleased Changed entry for Wave-43-D reaudit.

Score 396/402 (98% A) held conservative; WAVE43 impl lanes deepened residual
evidence only (per WBS-8.3/8.5/8.7 pattern).
- WAVE44_SCOPE.md: top-level scope (6 lanes; 3 machine, 3 human-gated)
- docs/ops/WAVE44_PERT.md: PERT with merge order, decision points, risk register
- CHANGELOG.md: Unreleased Changed entry for Wave-44 plan

Theme: stack-stability closure + i18n migration + eval coverage +
supply-chain signing. Three lanes require human-gated evidence
(signing keys, policy decision, prod rollout window).

Predecessor: Wave-43-D reaudit (PR #366) @ 41829e8 (396/402 98% A held).
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@KooshaPari, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 19 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9d421aa8-9224-459d-b39b-d9b5937a99e0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5629ab0 and 34a08ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (24)
  • .github/workflows/hermetic.yml
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • WAVE44_SCOPE.md
  • audit/SCORECARD.md
  • ci/hermetic-builder/Containerfile
  • crates/sl-daemon/src/cli.rs
  • crates/sl-daemon/src/discovery.rs
  • crates/sl-daemon/src/http.rs
  • crates/sl-daemon/src/main.rs
  • crates/sl-daemon/src/watcher.rs
  • crates/sl-viewer/src/app.rs
  • docs/ops/GAP_QA_MATRIX.md
  • docs/ops/TRACEABILITY.json
  • docs/ops/WAVE44_PERT.md
  • docs/ops/hermetic-builder.json
  • docs/ops/reusable-hermetic-pin.json
  • docs/ops/reusable-hermetic-pin.md
  • packaging/channels.md
  • packaging/homebrew/sessionledger.rb
  • packaging/macos/README.md
  • packaging/macos/install-launch-agent.sh
  • packaging/macos/install-local.sh
  • packaging/macos/package-app.sh
  • packaging/macos/package-pkg.sh
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/sl-w44-plan
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch feat/sl-w44-plan

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@KooshaPari

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closed in favor of b482cae1 docs(wave-44): plan close-out wave cherry-picked onto main (the PR's branch base was the pre-W43-merge state, so W44 plan only was cherry-picked; the W43-A→D re-merge was already on main via PR #366). Branch feat/sl-w44-plan retained.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant