Skip to content

Revert "Add example to read_file tool definition" - #4688

Merged
chrarnoldus merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-4526-christiaan/read_file
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

Revert "Add example to read_file tool definition"#4688
chrarnoldus merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-4526-christiaan/read_file

Conversation

@chrarnoldus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Reverts #4526

It doesn't seem to have helped much: https://us.posthog.com/project/141915/insights/TvhPfI2E

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Dec 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4e5e575

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@kilo-code-bot

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Dec 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ No Issues Found

1 file reviewed | Confidence: 95% | Recommendation: Merge

Review Details

Files: read_file.ts

Change Type: Revert of PR #4526

Summary: Clean revert removing the examples property from the read_file tool JSON schema. The tool description still contains comprehensive text-based examples, so functionality is preserved.

Checked: Security, bugs, breaking changes, code style

Notes:

  • No security vulnerabilities introduced
  • No logic errors or bugs
  • The examples property in JSON Schema is informational only - removing it has no functional impact
  • Revert is complete and clean

@chrarnoldus
chrarnoldus merged commit 5048db8 into main Dec 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@chrarnoldus
chrarnoldus deleted the revert-4526-christiaan/read_file branch December 29, 2025 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants