Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: reduce asynchronous stuff to resolve flickering #1951

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

arturovt
Copy link
Contributor

In this commit, we introduce a slightly smarter approach to handling custom module registration and executing the beforeRender function. The current issue is that the quill-editor-toolbar may be projected before the editor is rendered due to the Promise.all in mergeMap. This is noticeable on slower devices, where the toolbar appears first (without styles), and then after a microtask delay, Quill is created.

Switching to observables resolves this issue because observables can emit both synchronously and asynchronously, and most observables can cache their emissions using shareReplay, ensuring that subsequent emissions are always synchronous.

In this commit, we introduce a slightly smarter approach to handling custom module registration
and executing the `beforeRender` function. The current issue is that the `quill-editor-toolbar`
may be projected before the editor is rendered due to the `Promise.all` in `mergeMap`.
This is noticeable on slower devices, where the toolbar appears first (without styles),
and then after a microtask delay, Quill is created.

Switching to observables resolves this issue because observables can emit both synchronously and
asynchronously, and most observables can cache their emissions using `shareReplay`,
ensuring that subsequent emissions are always synchronous.
@KillerCodeMonkey
Copy link
Owner

noice! thanks!

@KillerCodeMonkey KillerCodeMonkey merged commit 2ed554b into KillerCodeMonkey:master Nov 14, 2024
1 check passed
@arturovt arturovt deleted the fix/flickering branch November 14, 2024 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants