Fix pretty printing of symbols by Test.jl

[nerdberg792]

Fixes #57287
When we perform a Test :

julia> x = 1; y = :sym; @test x == y
Test Failed at REPL[48]:1
  Expression: x == y
   Evaluated: 1 == sym

But ideally the test should print Evaluated 1 == :sym

I have changed the parsing of the arguments :

Updated Test.jl and added some if else conditions :

now the tests mentioned in the issue yields these results :

julia> x = 1; y = :sym; @test x == y
Test Failed at REPL[2]:1
  Expression: x == y
   Evaluated: 1 == :sym

julia> x = 1; y = :(1+1); @test x == y
Test Failed at REPL[2]:1
  Expression: x == y
   Evaluated: 1 == :(1 + 1)

[DilumAluthge]

Can you edit the PR title to be a bit more descriptive, e.g. to briefly describe the bug that is being fixed.

[nerdberg792]

Can you edit the PR title to be a bit more descriptive, e.g. to briefly describe the bug that is being fixed.

I have made some changes can you review my PR , also I haven't added any tests to check for the aforementioned bug

[nerdberg792]

@KristofferC can you please point out where should I add the tests

[LilithHafner]

stdlib/Test/test/runtests.jl

[KristofferC]

The last example in the first post is is already what is shown on master so not sure what is meant by that.

[KristofferC]

In which case is this used? What difference does it make?

[KristofferC]

I think it woud be better to put the whole logic into a function so it doesn't have to be repeated for both a and b.

[vtjnash]

That function is the existing Base.quoted function in this case

[nerdberg792]

The last example in the first post is is already what is shown on master so not sure what is meant by that.

I misinterpreted your comments on the issues , I have now made the necessary changes and it seems to work fine , can you please review this once , sorry for the inconvenience cause !

[LilithHafner]

This looks good so far. Would you please address Jameson's comment by using Base.quoted and Kristoffer's comment by adding tests that fail on master and pass on this PR?

[DilumAluthge]

@nerdberg792 Are you still interested in working on this?

[vtjnash]

Closed by #61054