Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Website UX #564

Closed
X4 opened this issue Mar 11, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

Website UX #564

X4 opened this issue Mar 11, 2012 · 3 comments

Comments

@X4
Copy link

X4 commented Mar 11, 2012

Hi,

I'm very curious to implement/try julia-lang as a back-end language for real-time data-processing in a private long time project, but using your website as informal medium isn't easy. It's cold-starting an interested user into a longish "I'm better see my benchmarks" discussion and talking more about other languages than Julia itself. That turns people usually away, except those like me who know what it is before-hand. (currently compiling it)

Take http://haxe.org/ for example. They present you with their "main point" then introduce you into other "ideas and concepts", when you're finally bought they can say we always presented you a link to docs/tutorials and sample code from the "start to now". You see I don't even criticize your design, which is ok, but the way you present your content. It's a subtle, but effective change in my opinion. If you didn't write a lexer yet for synthax-highlighting, you can use a generic lexer to highlight your code. Or http://quickhighlighter.com

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

Gotta be honest, the HaXe website turns me off immediately. I don't really want to see flashy graphics when I'm checking out a new programming language. I want to see what's different and interesting about the language. The HaXe site has an unattributed overblown quotation followed by a bunch of completely non-unique properties of the language: multiplatform, open source, familiar syntax, strictly typed, modern. Um, ok, you just described 90% of languages out there. There's nothing that tells me why I should use HaXe instead of anything else.

@raggi
Copy link
Contributor

raggi commented Mar 13, 2012

One of the things that made me really happy with Julia as I came to it a couple of months ago, was how immediately I found the manual, and how much it was like reading a book.

I think the site works great as it is. If someone wants to tart it up, I don't see a small, lightweight background piece under the header doing any significant damage. I would strongly recommend that the menu stay as obvious and accessible, and the content remains very high signal to noise ratio. I think this is a significant differentiator against many design-clappy websites out there today.

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Member

Just closing this because it's not a programming language issue. Doesn't preclude design enhancements to the site.

Keno pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2023
ViralBShah pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2024
Stdlib: SparseArrays
URL: https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl.git
Stdlib branch: main
Julia branch: master
Old commit: 0dd8d45
New commit: 14333ea
Julia version: 1.12.0-DEV
SparseArrays version: 1.12.0
Bump invoked by: @ViralBShah
Powered by:
[BumpStdlibs.jl](https://github.com/JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl)

Diff:
JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl@0dd8d45...14333ea

```
$ git log --oneline 0dd8d45..14333ea
14333ea Break recursion (#579)
07cf4a6 Update ci.yml (#578)
33491e0 added diagonal-sparse multiplication (#564)
8f02b7f doc: move solvers doc to `src\solvers.md` (#576)
485fd4b Inline sparse-times-dense in-place multiplication (#567)
f10d4da added specialized method for 3-argument dot with diagonal matrix (#565)
70c06b1 Diagonal-sandwiched triple product for SparseMatrixCSC (#562)
313a04f Change default QR tolerance to match SPQR (#557)
81d49e9 Update ci.yml (#558)
```

Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants