docs: add multilingual deployment guides - #90
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 29 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR expands deployment and operational documentation in English, Japanese, and Simplified Chinese, reorganizes environment configuration guidance, adds a Kasumigaseki location example, and documents JMA office codes. ChangesDocumentation and configuration
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR Summary by QodoDocs: add multilingual READMEs, JMA office code guide, and TZ startup notes
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (6)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@env.example`:
- Around line 23-24: Update the comment above LLM_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENS to remove
the direct token-versus-character comparison and document the intended
relationship using a meaningful, tested conversion or validation rule; preserve
the existing configuration values.
- Around line 36-38: Make provider-resolution documentation consistent across
env.example, README.md, README_ja.md, and README_zh-Hans.md: document the
Singapore/NEA and Japan/JMA automatic provider additions, or explicitly state
that setting WEATHER_PROVIDERS overrides and disables those regional defaults.
Ensure all regional examples describe the actual provider-resolution behavior
and preserve the intended default behavior when WEATHER_PROVIDERS is omitted.
In `@README_ja.md`:
- Line 133: Replace the shell comment “将来の日付の予報を確認” in the README guide with
equivalent natural Japanese wording, preserving the comment’s meaning and
surrounding instructions.
- Line 26: Update the QWeather reference in the README sentence to use the
provider’s official product name consistently, replacing the generic localized
phrase while preserving the existing credential and JWT documentation details.
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 50-51: Replace the recursive UID/GID ownership and mode-600
commands at README.md lines 50-51 with a shared group/ACL or equivalent
container-readable permissions strategy that preserves host operator access;
apply the same correction at README_ja.md lines 50-51 and README_zh-Hans.md
lines 50-51.
- Around line 111-121: Harden the copied private RSS file before it is mounted
by adding explicit restrictive permissions and ownership/read-access setup in
the Docker instructions. Apply the same guidance at README.md lines 111-121,
README_ja.md lines 111-121, and README_zh-Hans.md lines 111-121, preserving the
existing mount command and ensuring the file is readable by the container user
without permissive access.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: b6577218-2b89-4c93-a251-c8d7ab7504c1
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.mdREADME_ja.mdREADME_zh-Hans.mddocs/jma-office-codes.mdenv.examplelocations.example.json
Code Review by Qodo
Context used✅ Compliance rules (platform):
41 rules 1.
|
|
/review |
|
Addressed all eight CodeRabbit and Qodo findings in
Validation: 868 tests passed with branch coverage; line coverage remains 99.85% and branch coverage remains 99.54%, matching |
|
Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit ad8be4e |
|
Follow-up product decisions in
The Japanese command comment is now |
|
/review |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
|
Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit 57ce99f |
|
/review |
|
Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit a074913 |
Summary
BRIEFING_TIMEZONEto the container asTZValidation
prek run --all-filesuv run --with pytest --with pytest-cov -- pytest --cov --cov-branch --cov-report=xml(868 passed)master: line 99.85% -> 99.85%, branch 99.54% -> 99.54%Summary by CodeRabbit