Skip to content

Release v1.14.0#417

Merged
luislhl merged 11 commits into
releasefrom
release-candidate
May 11, 2026
Merged

Release v1.14.0#417
luislhl merged 11 commits into
releasefrom
release-candidate

Conversation

@luislhl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@luislhl luislhl commented May 7, 2026

andreabadesso and others added 9 commits April 20, 2026 17:57
db/config.js sets bigNumberStrings: true for all environments, which
causes mysql2 to return COUNT() values as strings ("0") instead of
numbers (0). Four index-creation migrations used strict equality
(=== 0 / > 0) against that string, so the condition was always false
and the CREATE INDEX statements were silently skipped — migrations
completed and were recorded in SequelizeMeta but created no indexes.

Affected migrations:
- 20251201104138-add-tx-output-utxo-lookup-index
- 20260108100000-add-tx-output-locked-heightlock-index
- 20260108100001-add-tx-output-locked-timelock-index
- 20260108100002-add-address-tx-history-addr-voided-token-index

Fix: wrap the count value with Number() before comparing, so both
string and numeric returns are handled correctly.

Note: databases that already ran these migrations will not get the
indexes automatically (migrations won't re-run). The missing indexes
must be created manually:

  CREATE INDEX idx_tx_output_utxo_lookup
    ON tx_output (address, token_id, spent_by, voided, locked, authorities);
  CREATE INDEX idx_tx_output_locked_heightlock
    ON tx_output (locked, heightlock);
  CREATE INDEX idx_tx_output_locked_timelock
    ON tx_output (locked, timelock);
  CREATE INDEX idx_address_tx_history_addr_voided_token
    ON address_tx_history (address, voided, token_id);

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 7, 2026 18:34
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 7, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 20f186b0-7663-4bef-b8fd-5df5f6a68fc3

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release-candidate

Tip

💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.

Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.

  • Generate code and open pull requests
  • Plan features and break down work
  • Investigate incidents and troubleshoot customer tickets together
  • Automate recurring tasks and respond to alerts with triggers
  • Summarize progress and report instantly

Built for teams:

  • Shared memory across your entire org—no repeating context
  • Per-thread sandboxes to safely plan and execute work
  • Governance built-in—scoped access, auditability, and budget controls

One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack.

👉 Get started


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@luislhl luislhl self-assigned this May 7, 2026
@luislhl luislhl moved this to In Progress (Done) in Hathor Network May 7, 2026
@luislhl luislhl requested review from pedroferreira1 and r4mmer May 7, 2026 18:44
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

pedroferreira1
pedroferreira1 previously approved these changes May 7, 2026
r4mmer
r4mmer previously approved these changes May 8, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In Progress (Done) to In Review (WIP) in Hathor Network May 8, 2026
@luislhl luislhl moved this from In Review (WIP) to In Review (Done) in Hathor Network May 8, 2026
@luislhl luislhl dismissed stale reviews from r4mmer and pedroferreira1 via 2ed91ce May 11, 2026 19:17
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In Review (Done) to In Review (WIP) in Hathor Network May 11, 2026
@luislhl luislhl moved this from In Review (WIP) to In Review (Done) in Hathor Network May 11, 2026
@luislhl luislhl merged commit acb01f0 into release May 11, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In Review (Done) to Waiting to be deployed in Hathor Network May 11, 2026
@luislhl luislhl moved this from Waiting to be deployed to Done in Hathor Network May 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants