Skip to content

feat: single address policy#899

Closed
r4mmer wants to merge 12 commits intomasterfrom
feat/single-address-policy
Closed

feat: single address policy#899
r4mmer wants to merge 12 commits intomasterfrom
feat/single-address-policy

Conversation

@r4mmer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@r4mmer r4mmer commented Jul 16, 2025

Acceptance Criteria

Create a single address policy so the wallet facade can work in a single address mode.

Security Checklist

  • Make sure you do not include new dependencies in the project unless strictly necessary and do not include dev-dependencies as production ones. More dependencies increase the possibility of one of them being hijacked and affecting us.

@r4mmer r4mmer self-assigned this Jul 16, 2025
@r4mmer r4mmer requested a review from pedroferreira1 as a code owner July 16, 2025 16:43
@r4mmer r4mmer moved this from Todo to In Progress (WIP) in Hathor Network Jul 16, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 62.50000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.97%. Comparing base (21ba6c1) to head (4dd2370).
⚠️ Report is 49 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/wallet/wallet.ts 37.50% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/utils/storage.ts 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (62.50%) is below the target coverage (70.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #899      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.00%   84.97%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         113      113              
  Lines        8389     8404      +15     
  Branches     1832     1847      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         7131     7141      +10     
- Misses       1229     1233       +4     
- Partials       29       30       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@r4mmer r4mmer moved this from In Progress (WIP) to In Progress (Done) in Hathor Network Jul 17, 2025
r4mmer added 8 commits July 17, 2025 13:24
…-policy

* origin/master: (31 commits)
  feat: fee token creation (#858)
  fix: checkAddressMine was crashing when called with an empty array (#977)
  feat: the nano amount field should accept 0
  Merge pull request #975 from HathorNetwork/chore/bump-v2.11.0
  feat: add nano execution logs API (#973)
  Refactor: Fullnode facade to Typescript (#972)
  Merge pull request #970 from HathorNetwork/chore/bump-v2.10.0
  fix: added missing tx proposal delete schema (#969)
  feat: add missing api calls for graphviz and nano (#967)
  Merge pull request #965 from HathorNetwork/feat/complete-token-info-object
  chore: bump package to v2.9.1 (#962)
  feat: catch and store async promise error (#960)
  chore: bump wallet lib to v2.9.0 (#958)
  tests: use core v0.67.0 docker image for the integration tests (#956)
  tests: update integration tests blueprints for the new core sdk (#954)
  fix: added a minimal accessData so methods that need storage don't crash (#955)
  feat: fee header (#951)
  feat: added read-only start (#950)
  fix: dont add metadata changed for voided txs (#948)
  test: Wallet Service infrastructure (#909)
  ...
@r4mmer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

r4mmer commented Mar 19, 2026

This change is being implemented on #1038

@r4mmer r4mmer closed this Mar 19, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress (Done) to Waiting to be deployed in Hathor Network Mar 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant