Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Mar 13, 2024
43eb06d to
5916646
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #967 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.05% 85.15% +0.10%
==========================================
Files 294 294
Lines 22782 22783 +1
Branches 3428 3430 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 19378 19402 +24
+ Misses 2718 2702 -16
+ Partials 686 679 -7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
jansegre
approved these changes
Mar 18, 2024
msbrogli
approved these changes
Mar 19, 2024
5916646 to
6c494e6
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Currently, the
BaseTransaction.hashproperty is of typeOptional[bytes], which is pretty inconvenient considering the hash has (and should have) a value most times. For that, we have to use asserts in multiple places to guarantee the value is notNone.This PR renames the existing optional property to
_hash, creating a new calculatedhashproperty that performs the assert for us. By doing it like this, every place that already uses the existinghashproperty will continue to work (only a few places that rely on the possibility of the value beingNonehad to be updated).Acceptance Criteria
BaseTransaction.hashproperty to_hashand add new non-nullhashproperty.Checklist
master, confirm this code is production-ready and can be included in future releases as soon as it gets merged