Skip to content

update esmFldsExchange_nems for ungridded wave fields; fix incorrect units in mediator files#338

Merged
jedwards4b merged 4 commits into
ESCOMP:mainfrom
DeniseWorthen:feature/updcmeps
Jan 12, 2023
Merged

update esmFldsExchange_nems for ungridded wave fields; fix incorrect units in mediator files#338
jedwards4b merged 4 commits into
ESCOMP:mainfrom
DeniseWorthen:feature/updcmeps

Conversation

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of changes

  • Updates names of partitioned stokes drift fields to use fields with ungridded dimensions in UFS.
  • Fixes an issue where the lat/lon units in the mediator history and restart files do not agree w/ underlying grid or mesh from component.
  • White space cleanup

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CMEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #): NOAA-EMC#81

Are changes expected to change answers? (specify if bfb, different at roundoff, more substantial)

no

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?

no

Testing performed

Testing performed if application target is CESM:

  • (recommended) CIME_DRIVER=nuopc scripts_regression_tests.py
    • machines:
    • details (e.g. failed tests):
  • (recommended) CESM testlist_drv.xml
    • machines and compilers:
    • details (e.g. failed tests):
  • (optional) CESM prealpha test
    • machines and compilers
    • details (e.g. failed tests):
  • (other) please described in detail
    • machines and compilers
    • details (e.g. failed tests):

Testing performed if application target is UFS-coupled:

  • (recommended) UFS-coupled testing
    • description: all tests are b4b with current develop
    • details (e.g. failed tests):

Testing performed if application target is UFS-HAFS:

  • (recommended) UFS-HAFS testing
    • description:
    • details (e.g. failed tests):

Hashes used for testing:

@jedwards4b jedwards4b merged commit c6f23c3 into ESCOMP:main Jan 12, 2023
@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen deleted the feature/updcmeps branch January 17, 2023 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants