[PROF-12841] Fix profiler not identifying executables with gems they belong to #4999
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR fixes the profiler's "code provenance" metadata to include the paths to gem executables (if any).
This ensures that, when e.g. starting
pumaviabin/pumaorbundle exec puma, we still identify the puma executable as belonging to thepumagem.Motivation:
The "code provenance" is used to power the "Only My Code" feature that shows up in multiple places in the profiler UX, and so we want it to be as accurate as possible.
Change log entry
Yes. Fix profiler not identifying executables with gems they belong to
Additional Notes:
N/A
How to test the change?
This change includes test coverage. It can also be tested easily by running
and checking that
bin/pryis correctly categorized as belonging to theprygem in the Datadog UX.Here's how this looked before:
and now: