Skip to content

Conversation

@clutchski
Copy link
Contributor

@clutchski clutchski commented Jul 31, 2016

an attempt at tracing mongo code as close to the network as possible. this means:

pros:

  • network is included in the round trip time
  • we catch every type of call (count, delete, insert, update, etc)
  • can track which host we're hitting

cons:

  • instruments internal apis so potentially ripe for backwards compat issues
  • bulk inserts (aka insert_many is a binary bulk message at this point, so needs a bit more work to extract the collection and db names)

resources are of the form:

operation collection [query]

drop users
insert users
query users {'name' : '?', 'age' : '?'}

some example traces:

# a find query
        id 455537890641258465
  trace_id 448566205805997819
 parent_id None
   service pokemongodb
  resource query teams {'name': '?'}
      type mongodb
     start 1469929906.19
       end 1469929906.19
  duration 0.000543s
     error 0
      tags
           mongodb.db:testdb
           out.host:localhost
           mongodb.collection:teams
           out.port:27017

# an insert
  resource insert teams
      type mongodb
     start 1469929906.18
       end 1469929906.19
  duration 0.006706s
     error 0
      tags
           mongodb.db:testdb
           mongodb.ordered:True
           mongodb.collection:teams
           out.host:localhost
           out.port:27017

# a db command 
   service pokemongodb
  resource drop teams
      type mongodb
     start 1469929906.18
       end 1469929906.18
  duration 0.002875s
     error 0
      tags
           mongodb.db:testdb
           out.host:localhost
           mongodb.collection:teams
           out.port:27017


def __init__(self, name, coll):
self.name = name
self.coll = coll
Copy link
Contributor

@talwai talwai Aug 1, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we just call it collection? it's not that long nvm looks like that's a pymongo thing

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea same same

@talwai
Copy link
Contributor

talwai commented Aug 1, 2016

some nits but looks good 👍.

@clutchski clutchski merged commit fa10440 into master Aug 1, 2016
@clutchski clutchski deleted the matt/mongo-net branch August 1, 2016 14:46
KowalskiThomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree 
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create 
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread 
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start 
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork 
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod 
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall 
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.
dd-octo-sts bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

(cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)
KowalskiThomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

(cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)
dd-octo-sts bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

(cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)
KowalskiThomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

(cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)
KowalskiThomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

(cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)
KowalskiThomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2026
…15858)

Backport 4c69fdd from #15798 to 4.1.

## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree 
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create 
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread 
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start 
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork 
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod 
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall 
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Kowalski <[email protected]>
KowalskiThomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

(cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)
KowalskiThomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2026
…15861)

Backport 4c69fdd from #15798 to 4.0.

## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree 
#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create 
#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread 
#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start 
#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork 
#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod 
#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall 
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Kowalski <[email protected]>
kianjones9 pushed a commit to kianjones9/dd-trace-py that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
## Description

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112

This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a
case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my
"code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using
`uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after
`uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork.

```
#0   0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree 
DataDog#1   0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create 
DataDog#2   0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread 
DataDog#3   0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start 
DataDog#4   0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3)
DataDog#5   0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24)
DataDog#6   0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork 
DataDog#7   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10)
DataDog#8   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9)
DataDog#9   0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18)
DataDog#10  0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19)
DataDog#11  0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16)
DataDog#12  0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28)
DataDog#13  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
DataDog#14  0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18)
DataDog#15  0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14)
DataDog#16  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16)
DataDog#17  0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15)
DataDog#18  0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14)
DataDog#19  0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18)
DataDog#20  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15)
DataDog#21  0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16)
DataDog#22  0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27)
DataDog#23  0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25)
DataDog#24  0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24)
DataDog#25  0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19)
DataDog#26  0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1)
DataDog#27  0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5)
DataDog#28  0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23)
DataDog#29  0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18)
DataDog#30  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18)
DataDog#31  0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13)
DataDog#32  0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod 
DataDog#33  0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23)
DataDog#34  0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13)
DataDog#35  0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall 
```

## Fix

The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a
"post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods
(e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so
we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag,
we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really
exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants