Instrument Elasticsearch #3

LotharSee · 2016-06-22T23:01:50Z

Initial working version of the elasticsearch instrumentation.

…pan, provider, helpers (#2180) * Enabled type hinting/checking for context, monkey, span, helpers * Type checked provider, addressed PR comments * Attempt #2 to remove circular dependency * Attempt to fix circular import #3 * Attempt to remove circular dependency #4 * Attempt to remove circular dependency #5 * Attempt 6 to remove circular dependency * Revert type checking check in provider.py * Reverted type check checking for tracer.py * Changed mistaken int arg type to float in span.duration setter Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Julien Danjou <[email protected]>

The ThreadSpanLinks singleton holds the active span (if one exists) for a given thread ID. The `get_active_span_from_thread_id` member function returns a pointer to the active span for a thread. The `link_span` member function sets the active span for a thread. `get_active_span_from_thread_id` accesses the map of spans under a mutex, but returns the pointer after releasing the mutex, meaning `link_span` can modify the members of the Span while the caller of `get_active_span_from_thread_id` is reading them. Fix this by returning a copy of the `Span`. Use a `std::optional` to wrap the return value of `get_active_span_from_thread_id`, rather than returning a pointer. We want to tell whether or not there actually was a span associated with the thread, but returning a pointer would require us to heap allocate the copy of the Span. I added a simplistic regression test which fails reliably without this fix when built with the thread sanitizer enabled. Output like: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2971510) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T2: #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::__invoke_impl<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe46e) #4 std::__invoke_result<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>::type std::__invoke<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe2fe) #5 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe1cf) #6 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe0f6) #7 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> > >::_M_run() <null> (thread_span_links+0xdf40) #8 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xd6df3) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M47): #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocato r<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 get() <null> (thread_span_links+0xb570) #4 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe525) #5 std::__invoke_result<void (*)()>::type std::__invoke<void (*)()>(void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe3b5) #6 void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe242) #7 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe158) [ ... etc ... ] ```

The ThreadSpanLinks singleton holds the active span (if one exists) for a given thread ID. The `get_active_span_from_thread_id` member function returns a pointer to the active span for a thread. The `link_span` member function sets the active span for a thread. `get_active_span_from_thread_id` accesses the map of spans under a mutex, but returns the pointer after releasing the mutex, meaning `link_span` can modify the members of the Span while the caller of `get_active_span_from_thread_id` is reading them. Fix this by returning a copy of the `Span`. Use a `std::optional` to wrap the return value of `get_active_span_from_thread_id`, rather than returning a pointer. We want to tell whether or not there actually was a span associated with the thread, but returning a pointer would require us to heap allocate the copy of the Span. I added a simplistic regression test which fails reliably without this fix when built with the thread sanitizer enabled. Output like: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2971510) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T2: #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::__invoke_impl<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe46e) #4 std::__invoke_result<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>::type std::__invoke<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe2fe) #5 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe1cf) #6 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe0f6) #7 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> > >::_M_run() <null> (thread_span_links+0xdf40) #8 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xd6df3) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M47): #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocato r<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 get() <null> (thread_span_links+0xb570) #4 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe525) #5 std::__invoke_result<void (*)()>::type std::__invoke<void (*)()>(void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe3b5) #6 void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe242) #7 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe158) [ ... etc ... ] ``` (cherry picked from commit 64b3374)

…t 2.12] (#11215) Backport 64b3374 from #11167 to 2.12. The ThreadSpanLinks singleton holds the active span (if one exists) for a given thread ID. The `get_active_span_from_thread_id` member function returns a pointer to the active span for a thread. The `link_span` member function sets the active span for a thread. `get_active_span_from_thread_id` accesses the map of spans under a mutex, but returns the pointer after releasing the mutex, meaning `link_span` can modify the members of the Span while the caller of `get_active_span_from_thread_id` is reading them. Fix this by returning a copy of the `Span`. Use a `std::optional` to wrap the return value of `get_active_span_from_thread_id`, rather than returning a pointer. We want to tell whether or not there actually was a span associated with the thread, but returning a pointer would require us to heap allocate the copy of the Span. I added a simplistic regression test which fails reliably without this fix when built with the thread sanitizer enabled. Output like: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2971510) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T2: #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::__invoke_impl<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe46e) #4 std::__invoke_result<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>::type std::__invoke<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe2fe) #5 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe1cf) #6 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe0f6) #7 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> > >::_M_run() <null> (thread_span_links+0xdf40) #8 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xd6df3) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M47): #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocato r<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 get() <null> (thread_span_links+0xb570) #4 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe525) #5 std::__invoke_result<void (*)()>::type std::__invoke<void (*)()>(void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe3b5) #6 void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe242) #7 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe158) [ ... etc ... ] ``` (cherry picked from commit 64b3374) ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

…t 2.13] (#11214) Backport 64b3374 from #11167 to 2.13. The ThreadSpanLinks singleton holds the active span (if one exists) for a given thread ID. The `get_active_span_from_thread_id` member function returns a pointer to the active span for a thread. The `link_span` member function sets the active span for a thread. `get_active_span_from_thread_id` accesses the map of spans under a mutex, but returns the pointer after releasing the mutex, meaning `link_span` can modify the members of the Span while the caller of `get_active_span_from_thread_id` is reading them. Fix this by returning a copy of the `Span`. Use a `std::optional` to wrap the return value of `get_active_span_from_thread_id`, rather than returning a pointer. We want to tell whether or not there actually was a span associated with the thread, but returning a pointer would require us to heap allocate the copy of the Span. I added a simplistic regression test which fails reliably without this fix when built with the thread sanitizer enabled. Output like: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2971510) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T2: #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::__invoke_impl<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe46e) #4 std::__invoke_result<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>::type std::__invoke<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe2fe) #5 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe1cf) #6 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe0f6) #7 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> > >::_M_run() <null> (thread_span_links+0xdf40) #8 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xd6df3) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M47): #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocato r<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 get() <null> (thread_span_links+0xb570) #4 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe525) #5 std::__invoke_result<void (*)()>::type std::__invoke<void (*)()>(void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe3b5) #6 void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe242) #7 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe158) [ ... etc ... ] ``` (cherry picked from commit 64b3374) ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

…t 2.14] (#11213) Backport 64b3374 from #11167 to 2.14. The ThreadSpanLinks singleton holds the active span (if one exists) for a given thread ID. The `get_active_span_from_thread_id` member function returns a pointer to the active span for a thread. The `link_span` member function sets the active span for a thread. `get_active_span_from_thread_id` accesses the map of spans under a mutex, but returns the pointer after releasing the mutex, meaning `link_span` can modify the members of the Span while the caller of `get_active_span_from_thread_id` is reading them. Fix this by returning a copy of the `Span`. Use a `std::optional` to wrap the return value of `get_active_span_from_thread_id`, rather than returning a pointer. We want to tell whether or not there actually was a span associated with the thread, but returning a pointer would require us to heap allocate the copy of the Span. I added a simplistic regression test which fails reliably without this fix when built with the thread sanitizer enabled. Output like: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2971510) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T2: #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::__invoke_impl<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe46e) #4 std::__invoke_result<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>::type std::__invoke<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe2fe) #5 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe1cf) #6 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe0f6) #7 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> > >::_M_run() <null> (thread_span_links+0xdf40) #8 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xd6df3) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M47): #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocato r<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 get() <null> (thread_span_links+0xb570) #4 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe525) #5 std::__invoke_result<void (*)()>::type std::__invoke<void (*)()>(void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe3b5) #6 void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe242) #7 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe158) [ ... etc ... ] ``` (cherry picked from commit 64b3374) ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

…t 2.15] (#11211) Backport 64b3374 from #11167 to 2.15. The ThreadSpanLinks singleton holds the active span (if one exists) for a given thread ID. The `get_active_span_from_thread_id` member function returns a pointer to the active span for a thread. The `link_span` member function sets the active span for a thread. `get_active_span_from_thread_id` accesses the map of spans under a mutex, but returns the pointer after releasing the mutex, meaning `link_span` can modify the members of the Span while the caller of `get_active_span_from_thread_id` is reading them. Fix this by returning a copy of the `Span`. Use a `std::optional` to wrap the return value of `get_active_span_from_thread_id`, rather than returning a pointer. We want to tell whether or not there actually was a span associated with the thread, but returning a pointer would require us to heap allocate the copy of the Span. I added a simplistic regression test which fails reliably without this fix when built with the thread sanitizer enabled. Output like: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2971510) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T2: #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::__invoke_impl<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe46e) #4 std::__invoke_result<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>::type std::__invoke<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe2fe) #5 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe1cf) #6 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe0f6) #7 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> > >::_M_run() <null> (thread_span_links+0xdf40) #8 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xd6df3) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M47): #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocato r<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 get() <null> (thread_span_links+0xb570) #4 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe525) #5 std::__invoke_result<void (*)()>::type std::__invoke<void (*)()>(void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe3b5) #6 void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe242) #7 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe158) [ ... etc ... ] ``` (cherry picked from commit 64b3374) ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) Co-authored-by: Taegyun Kim <[email protected]>

…t 2.16] (#11210) Backport 64b3374 from #11167 to 2.16. The ThreadSpanLinks singleton holds the active span (if one exists) for a given thread ID. The `get_active_span_from_thread_id` member function returns a pointer to the active span for a thread. The `link_span` member function sets the active span for a thread. `get_active_span_from_thread_id` accesses the map of spans under a mutex, but returns the pointer after releasing the mutex, meaning `link_span` can modify the members of the Span while the caller of `get_active_span_from_thread_id` is reading them. Fix this by returning a copy of the `Span`. Use a `std::optional` to wrap the return value of `get_active_span_from_thread_id`, rather than returning a pointer. We want to tell whether or not there actually was a span associated with the thread, but returning a pointer would require us to heap allocate the copy of the Span. I added a simplistic regression test which fails reliably without this fix when built with the thread sanitizer enabled. Output like: ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2971510) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T2: #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::__invoke_impl<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe46e) #4 std::__invoke_result<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>::type std::__invoke<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe2fe) #5 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe1cf) #6 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe0f6) #7 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > (*)()> > >::_M_run() <null> (thread_span_links+0xdf40) #8 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xd6df3) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000004080 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M47): #0 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:823 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #1 memcpy ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:815 (libtsan.so.0+0x42313) #2 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_assign(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocato r<char> > const&) <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x1432b4) #3 get() <null> (thread_span_links+0xb570) #4 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)()>(std::__invoke_other, void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe525) #5 std::__invoke_result<void (*)()>::type std::__invoke<void (*)()>(void (*&&)()) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe3b5) #6 void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) <null> (thread_span_links+0xe242) #7 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)()> >::operator()() <null> (thread_span_links+0xe158) [ ... etc ... ] ``` ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) Co-authored-by: Nick Ripley <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Taegyun Kim <[email protected]>

## Description `test_wrapper()` segfaults with following stack backtrace ``` #3 handle_posix_sigaction () at src/collector/crash_handler.rs:108 #4 <signal handler called> #5 0x000075fb182a92b9 in Datadog::Sample::push_release (count=1, lock_time=3896666036706324, this=<optimized out>) at /home/bits/project/ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/sample.cpp:235 #6 Datadog::Sample::push_release (this=<optimized out>, lock_time=3896666036706324, count=1) at /home/bits/project/ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/sample.cpp:231 #7 0x000075fb182bec5c in __pyx_pf_7ddtrace_8internal_7datadog_9profiling_4ddup_5_ddup_12SampleHandle_10push_release ( __pyx_v_count=<optimized out>, __pyx_v_value=0x75fb187c7250, __pyx_v_self=0x75fb187c7630) at /tmp/tmpxso4scef.build-lib/ddtrace.internal.datadog.profiling.ddup._ddup/_ddup.cpp:7956 #8 __pyx_pw_7ddtrace_8internal_7datadog_9profiling_4ddup_5_ddup_12SampleHandle_11push_release ( __pyx_v_self=0x75fb187c7630, __pyx_args=<optimized out>, __pyx_nargs=<optimized out>, __pyx_kwds=<optimized out>) at /tmp/tmpxso4scef.build-lib/ddtrace.internal.datadog.profiling.ddup._ddup/_ddup.cpp:7907 #9 0x000075fb1c35b495 in _PyObject_VectorcallTstate (kwnames=0x0, nargsf=<optimized out>, args=0x59d0af703300, ``` As it indexes into empty `values` [vector](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py/blob/d033f37c48994b061a00748a00724b54a110de39/ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/include/sample.hpp#L81). It is typically initialized by a call to `ddup.config()`. Shuffle the test code into `TestThreadingLockCollector` class to do so.  ## Testing Run `CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL=$(nproc) DD_FAST_BUILD=1 DD_TRACE_AGENT_URL=http://localhost:8126 riot -v run 9bb19fe --pass-env -- -s -vv -k test_wrapper`  ## Risks  ## Additional Notes  [PROF-12678](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-12678) [PROF-12678]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-12678?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ

## Description https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13114 This PR makes sure the Python Profiler's signal handler (for `SIGSEGV` and `SIGBUS`) is properly installed when the Sampler thread starts. Note that this (reinstalling our signal handler) does NOT break any other signal handler (Python's or another extension's) as our signal handler only swallows faults / jumps to the recovery path if it's been "armed" (otherwise it re-raises). What matters is that we should be the "first responder" when a fault happens. This is an attempt to fix a crash we saw in the testing environment where some workloads receive segmentation faults clearly coming from `safe_memcpy` in FastAPI / Django apps. The "real" root cause isn't yet known of me – Django and FastAPI don't seem to use `PYTHONFAULTHANDLER` or `faulthandler` based on the Github code – but after deploying those changes, we stopped seeing those crashes (0 in the past 4 days). <img width="2089" height="480" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c554ec0c-cfae-4311-bded-8082d8f79ed9" /> ``` Error UnixSignal: Process terminated with SEGV_MAPERR (SIGSEGV) #0 0x0000755d4295c18f safe_memcpy #1 0x0000755d42954879 copy_memory #2 0x0000755d42956826 GenInfo::create #3 0x0000755d42958c25 TaskInfo::create #4 0x0000755d42958cc7 TaskInfo::create #5 0x0000755d4295a618 ThreadInfo::unwind_tasks #6 0x0000755d4295b98b std::_Function_handler<void (_ts*, ThreadInfo&), Datadog::Sampler::sampling_thread(unsigned long)::{lambda(InterpreterInfo&)#1}::operator()(InterpreterInfo&) const::{lambda(_ts*, ThreadInfo&)#1}>::_M_invoke #7 0x0000755d42959906 for_each_thread #8 0x0000755d429599e5 std::_Function_handler<void (InterpreterInfo&), Datadog::Sampler::sampling_thread(unsigned long)::{lambda(InterpreterInfo&)#1}>::_M_invoke #9 0x0000755d4295c5b2 Datadog::Sampler::sampling_thread #10 0x0000755d4295c685 call_sampling_thread #11 0x0000755d45aeeea7 start_thread #12 0x0000755d45c05def clone ```

## Description https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112 This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my "code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using `uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after `uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork. ``` #0 0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree #1 0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create #2 0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread #3 0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start #4 0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3) #5 0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24) #6 0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork #7 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10) #8 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9) #9 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18) #10 0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19) #11 0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16) #12 0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28) #13 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #14 0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18) #15 0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14) #16 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16) #17 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15) #18 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #19 0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18) #20 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15) #21 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16) #22 0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27) #23 0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25) #24 0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24) #25 0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19) #26 0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1) #27 0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5) #28 0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23) #29 0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18) #30 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18) #31 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13) #32 0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod #33 0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23) #34 0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13) #35 0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall ``` ## Fix The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a "post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods (e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag, we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

## Description https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112 This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my "code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using `uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after `uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork. ``` #0 0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree #1 0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create #2 0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread #3 0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start #4 0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3) #5 0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24) #6 0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork #7 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10) #8 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9) #9 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18) #10 0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19) #11 0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16) #12 0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28) #13 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #14 0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18) #15 0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14) #16 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16) #17 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15) #18 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #19 0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18) #20 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15) #21 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16) #22 0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27) #23 0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25) #24 0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24) #25 0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19) #26 0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1) #27 0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5) #28 0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23) #29 0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18) #30 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18) #31 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13) #32 0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod #33 0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23) #34 0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13) #35 0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall ``` ## Fix The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a "post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods (e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag, we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really exist and so we shouldn't try to do it. (cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)

…15858) Backport 4c69fdd from #15798 to 4.1. ## Description https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112 This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my "code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using `uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after `uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork. ``` #0 0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree #1 0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create #2 0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread #3 0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start #4 0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3) #5 0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24) #6 0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork #7 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10) #8 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9) #9 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18) #10 0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19) #11 0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16) #12 0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28) #13 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #14 0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18) #15 0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14) #16 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16) #17 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15) #18 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #19 0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18) #20 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15) #21 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16) #22 0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27) #23 0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25) #24 0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24) #25 0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19) #26 0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1) #27 0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5) #28 0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23) #29 0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18) #30 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18) #31 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13) #32 0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod #33 0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23) #34 0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13) #35 0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall ``` ## Fix The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a "post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods (e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag, we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really exist and so we shouldn't try to do it. Co-authored-by: Thomas Kowalski <[email protected]>

## Description https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112 This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my "code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using `uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after `uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork. ``` #0 0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree #1 0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create #2 0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread #3 0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start #4 0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3) #5 0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24) #6 0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork #7 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10) #8 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9) #9 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18) #10 0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19) #11 0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16) #12 0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28) #13 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #14 0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18) #15 0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14) #16 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16) #17 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15) #18 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #19 0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18) #20 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15) #21 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16) #22 0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27) #23 0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25) #24 0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24) #25 0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19) #26 0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1) #27 0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5) #28 0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23) #29 0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18) #30 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18) #31 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13) #32 0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod #33 0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23) #34 0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13) #35 0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall ``` ## Fix The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a "post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods (e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag, we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really exist and so we shouldn't try to do it. (cherry picked from commit 4c69fdd)

…15861) Backport 4c69fdd from #15798 to 4.0. ## Description https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112 This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my "code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using `uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after `uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork. ``` #0 0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree #1 0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create #2 0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread #3 0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start #4 0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3) #5 0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24) #6 0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork #7 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10) #8 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9) #9 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18) #10 0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19) #11 0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16) #12 0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28) #13 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #14 0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18) #15 0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14) #16 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16) #17 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15) #18 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) #19 0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18) #20 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15) #21 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16) #22 0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27) #23 0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25) #24 0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24) #25 0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19) #26 0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1) #27 0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5) #28 0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23) #29 0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18) #30 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18) #31 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13) #32 0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod #33 0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23) #34 0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13) #35 0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall ``` ## Fix The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a "post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods (e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag, we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really exist and so we shouldn't try to do it. Co-authored-by: Thomas Kowalski <[email protected]>

## Description https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/PROF-13112 This is an attempt to address the following crash. There seems to be a case (that I wasn't able to reproduce in a Docker image, but maybe my "code environment" didn't match the customer's exactly) where using `uvloop` results in a crash caused by `PeriodicThread_start` after `uvloop` tries to restart Threads after a fork. ``` #0 0x00007f9a7acdbefa cfree DataDog#1 0x00007f9a7accc6b5 pthread_create DataDog#2 0x00007f9a7a63aaa5 std::thread::_M_start_thread DataDog#3 0x00007f9a7a639d18 PeriodicThread_start DataDog#4 0x00007f9a2e71d565 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__after_fork (uvloop/loop.c:120214:3) DataDog#5 0x00007f9a2e6369a8 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop___get_fork_handler (uvloop/loop.c:163075:24) DataDog#6 0x00007f9a7ad17073 __fork DataDog#7 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child_fork (src/unix/process.c:831:10) DataDog#8 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv__spawn_and_init_child (src/unix/process.c:919:9) DataDog#9 0x00007f9a2e732d62 uv_spawn (src/unix/process.c:1013:18) DataDog#10 0x00007f9a2e71fb87 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_9UVProcess__init (uvloop/loop.c:119056:19) DataDog#11 0x00007f9a2e711bf7 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_18UVProcessTransport_new (uvloop/loop.c:126866:16) DataDog#12 0x00007f9a2e712aa7 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_116generator16 (uvloop/loop.c:54030:28) DataDog#13 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) DataDog#14 0x00007f9a2e699f8a __Pyx_Coroutine_AmSend (uvloop/loop.c:196492:18) DataDog#15 0x00007f9a2e69a052 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From_Coroutine (uvloop/loop.c:197380:14) DataDog#16 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __Pyx_Coroutine_Yield_From (uvloop/loop.c:197408:16) DataDog#17 0x00007f9a2e69b0e5 __pyx_gb_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_122generator18 (uvloop/loop.c:55002:15) DataDog#18 0x00007f9a2e631419 __Pyx_Coroutine_SendEx (uvloop/loop.c:196315:14) DataDog#19 0x00007f9a2e69bb86 __Pyx_Generator_Next (uvloop/loop.c:196581:18) DataDog#20 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_Call (uvloop/loop.c:191431:15) DataDog#21 0x00007f9a2e6398eb __Pyx_PyObject_FastCallDict (uvloop/loop.c:191552:16) DataDog#22 0x00007f9a2e715a69 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66873:27) DataDog#23 0x00007f9a2e71996b __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__on_idle (uvloop/loop.c:17975:25) DataDog#24 0x00007f9a2e713e52 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_6Handle__run (uvloop/loop.c:66927:24) DataDog#25 0x00007f9a2e715c88 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_cb_idle_callback (uvloop/loop.c:87335:19) DataDog#26 0x00007f9a2e731311 uv__run_idle (unix/loop-watcher.c:68:1) DataDog#27 0x00007f9a2e72e647 uv_run (src/unix/core.c:439:5) DataDog#28 0x00007f9a2e64fdb5 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18458:23) DataDog#29 0x00007f9a2e6b7e50 __pyx_f_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop__run (uvloop/loop.c:18876:18) DataDog#30 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_24run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31528:18) DataDog#31 0x00007f9a2e6c8cf0 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_25run_forever (uvloop/loop.c:31331:13) DataDog#32 0x00007f9a7b065c25 PyObject_VectorcallMethod DataDog#33 0x00007f9a2e6ccd60 __pyx_pf_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_44run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33768:23) DataDog#34 0x00007f9a2e6ce591 __pyx_pw_6uvloop_4loop_4Loop_45run_until_complete (uvloop/loop.c:33318:13) DataDog#35 0x00007f9a7b039358 PyObject_Vectorcall ``` ## Fix The `_after_fork` boolean field marks that this thread object is in a "post-fork zombie state." When the flag is set to true, Thread methods (e.g. `join`) become no-ops because the threads do not exist anymore so we should not try to do something with them. By checking that same flag, we can tell that we are trying to start a Thread that doesn't really exist and so we shouldn't try to do it.

LotharSee added 3 commits June 22, 2016 18:39

Introduce a the elasticsearch integration

60c5164

Put params and body in ES meta, extend tests

922488b

Replace ES placeholder with ?

770db6c

LotharSee merged commit b86a7d1 into master Jun 23, 2016

LotharSee deleted the benjamin/elasticsearch branch June 28, 2016 17:33

labbati added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2018

[tmp] #3 shuold be faster

d776815

Yun-Kim referenced this pull request in Yun-Kim/dd-trace-py Mar 16, 2021

Attempt to fix circular import #3

8ee5d4c

szpulak mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2022

failed to send traces to Datadog Agent #4203

Closed

avara1986 mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2025

chore(ci): update testrunner #15432

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Instrument Elasticsearch #3

Instrument Elasticsearch #3

Uh oh!

LotharSee commented Jun 22, 2016

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Instrument Elasticsearch #3

Instrument Elasticsearch #3

Uh oh!

Conversation

LotharSee commented Jun 22, 2016

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants