Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update new CRM_V2 models with relationships #385

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

Cruikshanks
Copy link
Member

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4092

In the following PRs we added some new models for the crm_v2 schema

To keep the changes to a minimum we omitted the relationships between them and the existing InvoiceAccountModel. This change adds those relationships in.

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4092

In the following PR's we added some new models for the `crm_v2` schema

- [Add CRM_V2 address model](#378)
- [Add CRM_V2 contact model](#379)
- [Add CRM_V2 company model](#380)
- [Add CRM_V2 invoice account address model](#381)

To keep the changes to a minimum we omitted the relationships between them and the existing `InvoiceAccountModel`. This change adds those relationships in.
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 25, 2023
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks self-assigned this Aug 25, 2023
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2023 13:19
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks requested review from Jozzey and StuAA78 August 25, 2023 13:20
Copy link
Contributor

@Jozzey Jozzey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks merged commit 77e4277 into main Aug 29, 2023
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks deleted the add-crm-v2-model-relationships branch August 29, 2023 08:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants