Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove wait associated with Experiment start summary #298

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2023

Conversation

mellis13
Copy link
Contributor

@mellis13 mellis13 commented Jun 5, 2023

Currently there is a 10 second pause if summary=true is provided to Experiment.start(). After receiving user feedback, we have decided to remove that pause (#294). A separate issue has been posted to enable a preview of the experiment launch summary without invoking Experiment.start().

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #298 (f8f61f0) into develop (5fd3598) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #298      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    87.60%   87.64%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files           58       58              
  Lines         3323     3319       -4     
===========================================
- Hits          2911     2909       -2     
+ Misses         412      410       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
smartsim/experiment.py 79.85% <ø> (-0.59%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@billschereriii
Copy link
Contributor

I thought we were planning to add a dry run mode as well that would let users see the path of execution before committing to a run?

@mellis13
Copy link
Contributor Author

mellis13 commented Jun 7, 2023

My understanding was that the Experiment preview would be a separate PR that is out-of-scope of this release. But, in the meantime the pause would be removed to address user feedback in #294

Copy link
Contributor

@billschereriii billschereriii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for taking care of this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants