Skip to content

security(operations): retain private-reporting setting evidence - #423

Merged
seonghobae merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
security/private-vulnerability-reporting-evidence
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

security(operations): retain private-reporting setting evidence#423
seonghobae merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
security/private-vulnerability-reporting-evidence

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds a repository-owned read-only operational evidence path for issue #73 so protected source can periodically prove the GitHub private-vulnerability-reporting setting without conflating that setting with reporter UI, notifications, staffing, case access, or end-to-end disclosure exercise evidence.

TDD state

RED-only head ef3740763dad08253c139081f27abe798d4d6fdb adds an executable workflow contract requiring:

  • a named npm audit command;
  • manual plus scheduled execution;
  • read-only repository permissions and credential-free checkout;
  • no write permission or secret contract;
  • retained artifacts/security/private-vulnerability-reporting-audit.json evidence for 30 days.

Protected main has the audit implementation but no such workflow/package-script surface, so this contract is intentionally unsatisfied before the implementation mutation.

No central .github, naruon, contextual-orchestrator, App configuration, live reporter UI, or other dedicated-writer repository is modified. The PR remains Draft until the GREEN implementation and fresh exact-head application/reviewer/Security evidence are terminal.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 56 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5dfcf7be-9f7c-4814-8a35-eea8c1daac73

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d73c419 and 76846a1.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/private-vulnerability-reporting-audit.yml
  • docs/security/private-vulnerability-reporting-audit.md
  • package.json
  • scripts/private-vulnerability-reporting-audit.mjs
  • test/private-vulnerability-reporting-audit.test.ts
  • test/upload-artifact-node24-integrity.test.ts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2026 02:40
@seonghobae
seonghobae merged commit a779375 into main Aug 18, 2026
15 of 16 checks passed
@seonghobae
seonghobae deleted the security/private-vulnerability-reporting-evidence branch August 18, 2026 02:40
seonghobae pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2026
…e) into current main

origin/main's history was rewritten (new root ab3ebde at PR #450);
this PR's original base commit a779375 (#423-era) and its one
commit 7d95ca2 predate that rewrite and share no ancestor with
current main, so a normal merge is refused
("refusing to merge unrelated histories").

This records the old branch tip as merged history (satisfying
"merge base into head", not a rebase, and not a force-push) while
keeping the tree from the preceding commit, which already carries
the old branch's content reapplied onto current main by hand
(README.md patch applied verbatim since it was byte-identical at
the old base; docs/internal/README.md copied from the old head;
CHANGELOG.md bullet updated to the old head's wording).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant