test(identity): require tenant-scoped data-rights status lookup - #141
Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
test(identity): require tenant-scoped data-rights status lookup#141seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Superseded by #143
This branch completed the intended RED→GREEN development, but protected main advanced via #127 and its exact-contributor Today concurrency job then correctly exposed that this contributor head no longer contained the protected-main Today regression file. The general validation suite remained green; the remaining CI failure was base-staleness evidence, not a defect in the request-status implementation.
PR #143 rebuilds the same two-file implementation from exact current protected main
f4cae6d83eadb00019d2962a650c55c59a3349aeand must reacquire every exact-head gate. Keeping both PRs open would duplicate writer/check/review work.Refs #55, #143 and #21.