Skip to content

fix(rubric): refresh DIF applicability on exact predecessor - #787

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/fast-judge-accepted-type-regressionfrom
fix/item-bank-dif-applicability-refresh
Closed

fix(rubric): refresh DIF applicability on exact predecessor#787
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/fast-judge-accepted-type-regressionfrom
fix/item-bank-dif-applicability-refresh

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clean-stack refresh

This Draft rebuilds the unique DIF-applicability slice from #780 directly on the current exact predecessor codex/fast-judge-accepted-type-regression at 2c4113a4b7cdcfcdea8e900d80f19e438e376c92.

The previous #780 head was based on predecessor snapshot 11291fd5f03cf24e403289b0466a7b633d0d3971 and no longer descended from the current predecessor. The four #780-owned paths do not overlap #778's changed-file set; the production item_bank.py base blob is identical on the old and current predecessor (f1077a12237677624206cfef4ad2b8e122181d24). This replacement therefore preserves the exact four final file blobs from #780 without force-push, destructive rebase, or transferring old-head checks.

Preserved bounded contract

  • calibration requires calibration, item_fit, and item_information evidence;
  • calibration additionally requires exactly one of measured dif or governed dif_not_applicable;
  • neither or both fail closed;
  • dif_not_applicable is an applicability/governance determination only and does not establish fairness, invariance, cross-population equivalence, or measured DIF;
  • no estimator, psychometric arithmetic, persistence, provider integration, or hosted authorization changes.

Evidence boundary

Current source head: 071fdc818ff0736523b5936fd2791230ebbc8e20.

All prior #780 CI/review evidence is historical because the predecessor changed. Keep Draft until fresh exact-head/base checks and review are complete. #778 remains the predecessor and must integrate first; after any predecessor movement, regenerate base-sensitive evidence again.

Supersedes #780 after final lineage verification. Advances #609.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d74d0821-a612-4126-972e-e22065a07632

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by surgical GREEN on current main.

@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Aug 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant