Skip to content

feat(scoring): add governed enterprise issue evidence adapters - #529

Merged
seonghobae merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
feat-enterprise-issue-adapters-404
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

feat(scoring): add governed enterprise issue evidence adapters#529
seonghobae merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
feat-enterprise-issue-adapters-404

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add provider-neutral, immutable enterprise source, evidence-span, atomic-issue, counterevidence, stakeholder-perspective, and candidate-intervention contracts under fast_mlsirm.scoring.enterprise_issue
  • preserve direct facts, supported inferences, counterevidence, unresolved ambiguity, and stakeholder value judgments as distinct epistemic roles
  • compile exact source spans into the existing shared EvidenceReference boundary without introducing a parallel scoring schema
  • reject undeclared source revisions, mismatched counterevidence, sensitive raw-text metadata, duplicate evidence, and nondeterministic input ordering
  • add deterministic tests, buyer-facing interpretation boundaries, APA 7th references, and authoritative changelog material

Boundary

This slice performs no scoring, calibration, sentiment analysis, ranking, utility arithmetic, causal estimation, or high-stakes automation. Candidate interventions remain caller-supplied hypotheses. The next slice can add deterministic explicit-value parsing and shared ScoringRequest compilation over these contracts.

Advances #404

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 12 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 713ad9fb-8acc-41d6-9d5b-889614975364

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f6d2964 and 7a7a628.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • docs/changelog.d/enterprise-issue-evidence-contracts.md
  • docs/enterprise_issue_evidence_contracts.md
  • python/fast_mlsirm/scoring/enterprise_issue/__init__.py
  • python/fast_mlsirm/scoring/enterprise_issue/contracts.py
  • tests/test_scoring_enterprise_issue_contracts.py

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Comment thread .github/workflows/one-time-enterprise-issue-adapters.yml Fixed
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2026 21:37
@seonghobae
seonghobae merged commit d78e885 into main Aug 4, 2026
32 checks passed
@seonghobae
seonghobae deleted the feat-enterprise-issue-adapters-404 branch August 4, 2026 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants