Repository navigation
feat(ontology): expand source-post Voice-of-X taxonomy (ADR 0246) #713
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
be90618
feat(ontology): govern complete Voice-of-X taxonomy (ADR 0232)
seonghobae 4920039
fix(ontology): separate post voices from organization relations
f8f49fb
docs: align Voice-of-X changelog vocabulary
ce48b5f
docs(ontology): record Voice-of-X composition gap
seonghobae 203d425
fix(frontend): localize expanded voice filters
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ | ||
| # ADR 0246: Expanded Voice-of-X post taxonomy | ||
|
|
||
| ## Status | ||
|
|
||
| Accepted (2026-08-26). Extends ADR 0207 decision 8 without claiming that the | ||
| result is an exhaustive stakeholder taxonomy. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Context | ||
|
|
||
| `source_post.voc_type_code` records what kind of voice a source post carries. | ||
| The existing five-code scheme (`voc`, `vocc`, `voco`, `vom`, `vop`) cannot | ||
| represent supplier, employee, internal-business, regulator, investor, | ||
| society, or process-generated source records without changing the source | ||
| classification or rejecting the import. | ||
|
|
||
| `post_counterparty_entity.relationship_type_code` answers a different | ||
| question: how a named organization relates to the post author's organization. | ||
| A post voice is not evidence that every organization named in the post has the | ||
| same relationship. This ADR therefore does not mirror post-type codes into the | ||
| counterparty relationship vocabulary. Any future relationship term requires | ||
| its own direction, evidence contract, and source-grounded definition. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Decision | ||
|
|
||
| Add seven product-controlled concepts to the existing `voc_type` scheme: | ||
|
|
||
| | Code | Label | Source category represented | | ||
| | --- | --- | --- | | ||
| | `vos` | Voice of Supplier | supplier-authored or supplier-originated record | | ||
| | `voe` | Voice of Employee | employee-authored or employee-originated record | | ||
| | `vob` | Voice of Business | internal-management or business-unit record | | ||
| | `vor` | Voice of Regulator | regulator-authored or regulator-originated record | | ||
| | `voi` | Voice of Investor | investor-authored or investor-originated record | | ||
| | `voso` | Voice of Society | community or public-stakeholder record | | ||
| | `vops` | Voice of Process | process- or system-generated record | | ||
|
|
||
| These are governed LineageWeave codes, not a claim that Freeman (1984), | ||
| Mitchell et al. (1997), ISO 16355-4, or quality-engineering literature defines | ||
| this exact twelve-code list. The cited works support distinguishing stakeholder | ||
| voices and process evidence; they do not establish an exact term-level | ||
| crosswalk. `vocc`, `vom`, and the product's code abbreviations remain existing | ||
| local vocabulary. | ||
|
|
||
| The scheme stays open to a later evidence-backed extension. Import preserves | ||
| the supplied code and provenance; no classifier, keyword rule, default, or | ||
| weight assigns one of these values. Missing or unsupported source codes remain | ||
| unavailable rather than being forced into a nearby category. | ||
|
|
||
| Codes remain globally unique lowercase literals in | ||
| `common_lookup_value.lookup_code`. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Consequences | ||
|
|
||
| - `migrations/0235_voice_of_x_post_taxonomy.sql` adds the seven `voc_type` | ||
| values idempotently and does not alter existing rows. | ||
| - `docs/ontology/lineageweave-kg.ttl` publishes one SKOS concept for each new | ||
| code under `:postTypeScheme`. | ||
| - The ontology round-trip test proves that the migration and published | ||
| vocabulary agree. | ||
| - The API's existing lookup-label path supplies filter values and labels; no | ||
| customer-facing explanation exposes database, migration, or classifier | ||
| boundaries. | ||
| - The counterparty relationship classifier remains on its independently | ||
| governed six-code vocabulary. | ||
|
|
||
| ## References | ||
|
|
||
| AccountAbility. (2015). *AA1000 stakeholder engagement standard*. | ||
| https://www.accountability.org/standards/aa1000-stakeholder-engagement | ||
|
|
||
| AccountAbility. (2025). *AccountAbility launches public consultation for the | ||
| AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard (AA1000SES v3)*. | ||
| https://www.accountability.org/insights/accountability-launches-public-consultation-for-the-aa1000-stakeholder-engagement-standard-aa1000ses-v3 | ||
|
|
||
| Freeman, R. E. (1984). *Strategic management: A stakeholder approach*. | ||
| Pitman. | ||
|
|
||
| Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., & | ||
| Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. | ||
| *Harvard Business Review, 72*(2), 164-174. | ||
|
|
||
| International Organization for Standardization. (2017). *Applications of | ||
| statistical and related methods to new technology and product development | ||
| process—Part 4: Analysis of non-quantitative and quantitative Voice of | ||
| Customer and Voice of Stakeholder* (ISO Standard No. 16355-4:2017). | ||
| https://www.iso.org/standard/62607.html | ||
|
|
||
| International Organization for Standardization. (2023, December 19). | ||
| *Global Directory stakeholder categories*. | ||
| https://helpdesk-docs.iso.org/article/331-gd-stakeholders-categories | ||
|
|
||
| International Organization for Standardization. (2010). *Guidance on social | ||
| responsibility* (ISO Standard No. 26000:2010). | ||
| https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html | ||
|
|
||
| Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of | ||
| stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and | ||
| what really counts. *Academy of Management Review, 22*(4), 853-886. | ||
| https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105 | ||
|
|
||
| Shewhart, W. A. (1931). *Economic control of quality of manufactured | ||
| product*. D. Van Nostrand. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 Changelog drops entries for features still in the tree
This edit deletes the changelog entries for the occupational-construct (ADRs 0248-0255) and DOT/FJA worker-function work, yet
worker_function_taxonomyand migrations 0238-0241 remain in the tree. The changelog no longer documents these present, unreleased features.Prompt for agents
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.