Skip to content

Conversation

@pikachu0542
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

costowell and others added 17 commits September 9, 2025 21:56
* migration, url fixes

* chom
* chom

* chom
* Revert "packet glue (#407)"

This reverts commit 2b4bc44.

* Revert "chom (#406)"

This reverts commit 8a6b501.

* Revert "chom (#405)"

This reverts commit a904044.

* Revert "packet glue (#404)"

This reverts commit ee6fc41.

* Revert "migration, url fixes (#403)"

This reverts commit 736d203.

* Revert "Merge pull request #402 from Qelxiros/packet-glue"

This reverts commit 0fc55d5, reversing
changes made to 4fe950f.

* Revert "glue (#401)"

This reverts commit 4fe950f.

* Revert "packet glue but again (navbar yippee) (#400)"

This reverts commit 49c7bab.

* Revert "packet glue but even more (#399)"

This reverts commit 55ea7f8.

* Revert "Merge pull request #398 from Qelxiros/packet-glue"

This reverts commit 416bc10, reversing
changes made to baf42df.

* Revert "packet glue but again (#397)"

This reverts commit baf42df.

* Revert "Merge pull request #396 from Qelxiros/packet-glue"

This reverts commit f936afd, reversing
changes made to d3a0280.
add css animation to dropdown arrows
* move gatekeep_status to members.py

* Fix errors in gatekeep_status

* Fix unused import, fix logic error

* Remove duplicate imports

* Remove non-existent options from lint
"h_meetings": h_meetings,
"c_meetings": d_meetings,
"t_seminars": t_seminars,
}, 200
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we move the response code to the actual route? This seems like it could maybe be a useful function to have independent of the actual route logic and to me it makes more sense at least

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's actually so real 👍 Big agree

Copy link
Contributor

@BigSpaceships BigSpaceships left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good I messed up my one comment but little nitpick stuff

Comment on lines 170 to 171


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we probably should get rid of the whitespace

Copy link
Contributor

@goosenotduck goosenotduck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good, agree with @BigSpaceships's proposed changes

didn't look at dependency stuff

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
FROM docker.io/python:3.8-buster
MAINTAINER Devin Matte <matted@csh.rit.edu>
FROM docker.io/python:3.12-bookworm
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3.12-bookworm is a pretty big image has has a lot of vulns, could a slim image be used here(10x smaller)?
https://hub.docker.com/_/python/tags?name=3.12

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this is a good idea, but I feel like that change is out of scope of this PR

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 definitely out of scope

import io
from datetime import datetime
from distutils.util import strtobool # pylint: disable=no-name-in-module,import-error
from distutils.util import strtobool # pylint: disable=no-name-in-module,import-error,deprecated-module
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Crazy work 😭

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I honestly dont remember why I did this 😭 Im pretty sure I had an actual reason, though

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like the cursedness of whatever evals csv import stuff is going on

@costowell
Copy link
Contributor

Is #419 the only thing blocking this?

Copy link
Contributor

@BigSpaceships BigSpaceships left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM now (we do need to fix the merge conflict?)

@pikachu0542 pikachu0542 merged commit bc8b71c into master Oct 21, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants