test: rename EtlPipelineTests class (fix MA0049 blocking #278) - #283
Merged
Conversation
The test class name matched its containing namespace segment (...Tests.Unit.EtlPipelineTests), tripping InspectCode MA0049 as an error and blocking #278. Rename the class; namespace/file unchanged. This is the only error-severity InspectCode finding on vNext. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Jul 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The single InspectCode error on vNext (and therefore on #278 vNext→main) is MA0049 — the test class
EtlPipelineTestsmatches its namespace segment…Tests.Unit.EtlPipelineTests. Rename it toEtlPipelineCoreTests; namespace and file unchanged. One-line change, 25 EtlPipeline tests pass.Note: an earlier PR of mine (#282's intended content) that also did this rename got superseded — #282 merged a divergent commit, so the rename never reached vNext. This applies it directly off current vNext.
Merge → vNext → #278 re-runs → InspectCode passes.
Separately:
Fromon vNext is still an instance method (draws non-blocking S2325 warnings). The extension conversion we discussed didn't land either — let me know if you still want it before 0.16.0.