优化访问码输入框

[code-october]

💻 变更类型 | Change Type

• feat
• fix
• refactor
• perf
• style
• test
• docs
• ci
• chore
• build

🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change

当前首页访问码输入框默认为密文字符，且不提供切换为明文的方式，输入极易发生错误，使用可切换为明文显示的 passwordInput 替换 input

📝 补充信息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new PasswordInput component for enhanced password entry.
  • Improved accessibility with ARIA attributes in the password input field.

• Bug Fixes

  • Streamlined password input handling for better user experience.

[vercel]

@code-october is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new PasswordInput component in app/components/auth.tsx, replacing the standard password input field in the AuthPage component. This new component utilizes additional properties for styling and accessibility, including ARIA attributes. The input type has been modified from "password" to "text," while still binding the value to accessStore.accessCode. The overall structure of the AuthPage component has been adjusted to integrate this new input method, enhancing accessibility without altering the TopBanner function.

Changes

File	Change Summary
app/components/auth.tsx	Introduced PasswordInput component, replaced standard password input, added ARIA attributes, and adjusted structure of AuthPage.
app/components/ui-lib.tsx	Added new PasswordInput component.

Possibly related PRs

• 修复ChatGPTNextWeb页面的无障碍问题 #5219: Enhances accessibility by adding ARIA attributes to various components, aligning with improvements in the PasswordInput.
• Modify View All Languages #5303: Focuses on localization but relates to user interface improvements, including accessibility aspects.
• i18n: improve tw Traditional Chinese locale #5602: Improves the Traditional Chinese locale, which may relate to the accessibility enhancements in the main PR, particularly if the PasswordInput component is intended for use in a localized context.

Suggested reviewers

• lloydzhou
• Dogtiti

🐰 In the meadow, I hop and play,
A new input's here to brighten the day!
With ARIA tags, it’s clear and bright,
Passwords now handled with delight!
Hopping along, we make it right! 🌼

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c98dc31 and 4a7fd3a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• app/components/auth.tsx (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 Biome

app/components/auth.tsx

[error] 73-73: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

[error] 90-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

🔇 Additional comments (6)

app/components/auth.tsx (6)

14-14: LGTM: Import of PasswordInput component

The import of the PasswordInput component from the UI library is correct and aligns with the PR objectives to optimize the access code input box.

---

64-77: LGTM: PasswordInput implementation for access code

The implementation of the PasswordInput component for the access code aligns well with the PR objectives. It improves accessibility and maintains the correct functionality for updating the access store.

However, I noticed that the type attribute is set to "text" instead of "password". While this might be intentional for the toggle functionality mentioned in the PR objectives, it's worth confirming if this is the desired behavior.

Could you please confirm if setting the type to "text" is intentional? If not, consider changing it to "password" and implementing the toggle functionality within the PasswordInput component.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome

[error] 73-73: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

Line range hint 94-106: Consider scope and security for Google API key input

Similar to the OpenAI API key input, the implementation of PasswordInput for the Google API key raises the same concerns:

1. Scope of changes: This change to the Google API key input wasn't explicitly stated in the PR objectives.

2. Security concern: The type attribute is set to "text", which could potentially expose the sensitive API key.

Could you please confirm if these changes to the Google API key input were intended to be part of this PR? If so, consider changing the type to "password" for better security:

- type="text"
+ type="password"

Also, please update the PR description to include these additional changes for clarity if they were intended.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome

[error] 73-73: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

[error] 90-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

[error] 103-103: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

73-73: Static analysis hints can be ignored

The static analysis tool reported errors for assignments in expressions on lines 73 and 90. These are false positives and can be safely ignored. The pattern used here is a common and valid React pattern for updating state within onChange handlers.

The code is using arrow functions to update the accessStore, which is a clean and efficient way to handle state updates in React components.

Also applies to: 90-90

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome

[error] 73-73: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

Line range hint 1-190: Summary of changes and recommendations

The implementation of the PasswordInput component for the access code input aligns well with the PR objectives and improves both accessibility and user experience. However, there are a few points that need attention:

1. Confirm if the type="text" for the access code input is intentional for implementing the toggle functionality.
2. Clarify if the changes to the OpenAI and Google API key inputs were intended to be part of this PR. If so:
   a. Update the PR description to include these changes.
   b. Consider changing the type to "password" for these fields to enhance security.
3. If the API key input changes were not intended, consider reverting them to keep the PR focused on the access code input optimization.

Overall, the changes improve the user interface and accessibility. Addressing these points will ensure that the implementation fully meets the PR objectives and maintains security best practices.

Please review and address the points mentioned above. Let me know if you need any further assistance or clarification on implementing these recommendations.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome

[error] 73-73: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

[error] 90-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

[error] 103-103: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

81-93: ⚠️ Potential issue

Consider scope and security for OpenAI API key input

While the implementation of PasswordInput for the OpenAI API key is consistent with the access code input, it raises a couple of concerns:

1. Scope of changes: The PR objectives specifically mentioned optimizing the access code input box. This change to the API key input wasn't explicitly stated in the objectives.

2. Security concern: The type attribute is set to "text", which could potentially expose the sensitive API key. Consider using "password" as the type for this field.

Could you please clarify if these changes to the OpenAI API key input were intended to be part of this PR? If so, consider changing the type to "password" for better security:

- type="text"
+ type="password"

Also, you might want to update the PR description to include these additional changes for clarity.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome

[error] 90-90: The assignment should not be in an expression.

The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.

(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Your build has completed!

Preview deployment

[lloydzhou]

这个页面的三个输入框，应该都需要优化

[Issues-translate-bot]

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.

---

The three input boxes on this page should all need to be optimized.

[code-october]

这个页面的三个输入框，应该都需要优化

都改也行，我主要是想着最小改动原则嘛，另外两个基本都是复制粘贴型的，访问码手动输入的概率比较高，所以就只改了访问码的输入框

[Issues-translate-bot]

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.

---

The three input boxes on this page should all need to be optimized.

You can change both. I mainly think about the principle of minimal changes. The other two are basically copy and paste types. The probability of manually entering the access code is relatively high, so I only changed the input box of the access code.