Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hotfix for x-goog-api-key #5562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

hotfix for x-goog-api-key #5562

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

lloydzhou
Copy link
Member

@lloydzhou lloydzhou commented Sep 29, 2024

πŸ’» ε˜ζ›΄η±»εž‹ | Change Type

  • feat
  • fix
  • refactor
  • perf
  • style
  • test
  • docs
  • ci
  • chore
  • build

πŸ”€ ε˜ζ›΄θ―΄ζ˜Ž | Description of Change

πŸ“ θ‘₯充俑息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved handling of API keys and authorization tokens for enhanced security and reliability.
    • Corrected URL construction for API requests to ensure proper query parameter formatting.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Fixed header usage for API key retrieval to ensure consistency and accuracy.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 29, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git β†—οΈŽ

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nextchat βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback Sep 29, 2024 7:53am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the app/api/google.ts file focus on improving the handling of authorization tokens and API keys. The retrieval logic now prioritizes the x-goog-api-key header over the Authorization header, with a fallback to an empty string. Additionally, the construction of the fetch URL has been updated to ensure proper formatting of query parameters, and the header for the API key has been corrected. These adjustments streamline the process of managing API requests.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/api/google.ts Updated authorization token retrieval to prioritize x-goog-api-key header; adjusted fetch URL query parameter formatting; corrected API key header from x-google-api-key to x-goog-api-key.

Suggested reviewers

  • Dogtiti

Poem

In the code where tokens play,
A rabbit hops and clears the way.
With keys aligned and headers bright,
Fetching data feels just right!
So let us cheer for changes made,
In the world of code, a lovely upgrade! πŸ‡βœ¨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/api/google.ts (2)

96-96: LGTM! Consider handling multiple query parameters.

The change correctly handles the alt=sse query parameter. However, consider if there might be cases where multiple query parameters need to be appended. If so, a more robust URL construction method might be beneficial.

If multiple query parameters are possible, consider using the URLSearchParams API for more robust URL construction:

const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(req.nextUrl.searchParams);
if (searchParams.get("alt") === "sse") {
  searchParams.set("alt", "sse");
}
const fetchUrl = `${baseUrl}${path}${searchParams.toString() ? `?${searchParams.toString()}` : ""}`;

104-106: LGTM! Consider minor optimization.

The changes are consistent with the earlier modifications and align with the PR objective. The use of the nullish coalescing operator is a good practice.

Consider extracting the API key retrieval logic into a separate function for better reusability and consistency:

function getApiKey(headers: Headers): string {
  return headers.get("x-goog-api-key") || 
         (headers.get("Authorization") ?? "").replace("Bearer ", "");
}

// Usage in fetchOptions
"x-goog-api-key": getApiKey(req.headers),

This would ensure consistent API key retrieval across the codebase and make future modifications easier.

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9d6f4f and 5bdf411.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/api/google.ts (2 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (2)
app/api/google.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-134: Overall, the changes look good and address the PR objective.

The modifications consistently prioritize the x-goog-api-key header and update the related logic throughout the file. The changes appear to be a suitable hotfix for the issue mentioned in the PR title.

A few minor suggestions and verifications have been proposed to further improve the code:

  1. Verify the handling of empty API key fallback.
  2. Consider a more robust method for handling multiple query parameters.
  3. Extract the API key retrieval logic into a separate function for better reusability.

These suggestions are not critical but could enhance the code quality and maintainability.


26-27: LGTM! Verify empty string fallback behavior.

The change to prioritize the x-goog-api-key header aligns with the PR objective. However, ensure that using an empty string as a fallback doesn't lead to unexpected behavior in downstream code.

Let's verify how the empty string fallback is handled:

βœ… Verification successful

Empty string fallback is properly handled.

The implementation includes checks for empty apiKey in app/api/google.ts and other relevant files, ensuring that an empty string fallback does not lead to unexpected behavior in downstream code.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how empty API key is handled in the codebase

# Search for API key usage
rg "apiKey" --type typescript -C 3

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how empty API key is handled in the codebase

# Search for API key usage
rg "apiKey" --type ts -C 3

Length of output: 8298


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Investigate how 'bearToken' and 'apiKey' are handled when empty strings are used

# Search for 'bearToken' usage
rg "bearToken" --type ts -C 3

# Search for 'apiKey' usage
rg "apiKey" --type ts -C 3

Length of output: 9432

Copy link
Contributor

Your build has completed!

Preview deployment

@lloydzhou lloydzhou merged commit 452fc86 into main Sep 29, 2024
3 checks passed
@lloydzhou lloydzhou deleted the hotfix-google-api branch October 14, 2024 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant