-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
google gemini support function call #5581
google gemini support function call #5581
Conversation
@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on enhancing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
π Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI π Files selected for processing (3)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
π§° Additional context usedπ Additional comments (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Your build has completed! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
291-315
: Approved with suggestions for improvementThe changes to the
fetch
function improve its flexibility and consistency. However, I have a few suggestions:
- Consider separating the Tauri-specific logic into a separate function for better maintainability.
- The
options?.responseType == "text"
check might be more robust as a strict equality check (===
).- Consider using TypeScript's type system more effectively to avoid type assertions.
Here's a suggested refactor:
function tauriFetch(url: string, options?: Record<string, unknown>): Promise<any> { const payload = options?.body || options?.data; return window.__TAURI__.fetch(url, { ...options, body: payload && { type: "Text", payload, }, timeout: ((options?.timeout as number) || REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS) / 1000, responseType: options?.responseType === "text" ? ResponseType.Text : ResponseType.JSON, }); } export function fetch(url: string, options?: Record<string, unknown>): Promise<any> { if (window.__TAURI__) { return tauriFetch(url, options); } return window.fetch(url, options); }This refactor separates the Tauri-specific logic, uses strict equality, and reduces the need for type assertions.
app/utils/chat.ts (4)
Line range hint
22-34
: Prevent potential infinite loop in 'compressImage' functionIn the
compressImage
function, thedo...while
loop may result in an infinite loop if the image cannot be compressed belowmaxSize
, especially when both quality and dimensions reach their minimum thresholds. Consider adding a maximum number of iterations or additional checks to prevent a potential infinite loop.Apply this diff to implement a maximum iteration count:
let iteration = 0; do { // existing code... iteration++; -} while (dataUrl.length > maxSize); +} while (dataUrl.length > maxSize && iteration < 10); +if (iteration >= 10) { + console.warn('Image compression stopped after reaching maximum iterations'); +}
Line range hint
162-164
: Avoid suppressing TypeScript errors with@ts-ignore
The use of
@ts-ignore
suppresses TypeScript errors, which may hide potential issues and reduce type safety. To improve code quality, consider properly typingfuncs
andtool
so that TypeScript can correctly type-check this code without the need for@ts-ignore
.You can define appropriate TypeScript interfaces for
funcs
andtool
to ensure type correctness.
Line range hint
119-130
: Possible race condition infinish
function leading to multiplechatApi
callsIn the
finish
function, when!finished
and!running && runTools.length > 0
, the function callschatApi
after asetTimeout
, butrunning
is set tofalse
before callingchatApi
. This could lead to multiple concurrentchatApi
calls iffinish
is invoked again beforechatApi
completes. Consider ensuringrunning
remainstrue
untilchatApi
has completed its execution to prevent concurrent calls.Apply this diff to adjust the
running
flag appropriately:- running = false; chatApi(chatPath, headers, requestPayload, tools); // call fetchEventSource + running = false;
Line range hint
116-127
: OptimizeanimateResponseText
for smoother updatesThe
animateResponseText
function usesrequestAnimationFrame
for text updates, but whenremainText.length
is large, it might cause UI lag due to heavy processing within each frame. Consider throttling updates or processing smaller chunks per frame to ensure smoother UI performance.
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (3)
- app/client/platforms/google.ts (2 hunks)
- app/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- app/utils/chat.ts (1 hunks)
π Additional comments (4)
app/utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-391
: Summary of changes and suggestions
- The addition of Google provider support in the
showPlugins
function is approved, but clarification is needed on why vision models are excluded for Google.- The
fetch
function improvements are approved, but a refactor is suggested for better separation of concerns between browser and Tauri environments.Overall, these changes seem to support Google Gemini integration as mentioned in the PR title. However, more context in the PR description would have been helpful for a more comprehensive review.
287-289
: LGTM, but clarification needed on vision model exclusionThe addition of Google provider support is consistent with the function's structure. However, could you please clarify why vision models are excluded for Google? This information would be helpful for maintainers and could potentially be added as a comment.
To ensure consistency, let's check for any other occurrences of Google provider handling:
app/client/platforms/google.ts (1)
184-188
: Verify initialization of 'mask' and 'plugin' properties to prevent undefined behaviorIn lines 184-188, the code accesses
useChatStore.getState().currentSession().mask?.plugin || []
to retrieve plugins. Ensure thatcurrentSession()
,mask
, andplugin
are properly initialized to avoid potential runtime errors if any of these properties areundefined
ornull
.app/utils/chat.ts (1)
243-243
: Ensuretool.id
is defined and uniqueThe addition of
tool_call_id: tool.id
assumes that eachtool
object has anid
property that is defined and unique. Please verify thattool.id
is always initialized before this point to prevent undefined values or collisions.Run the following script to search for assignments to
tool.id
in the codebase:
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Refactor