Feature fix openai function call

[lloydzhou]

💻 变更类型 | Change Type

• feat
• fix
• refactor
• perf
• style
• test
• docs
• ci
• chore
• build

🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change

📝 补充信息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved handling of tool call indices to ensure accurate tracking during processing.
• Refactor
  • Streamlined the logic for managing tool call indices by removing redundant declarations.

[vercel]

@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the ChatGPTApi class focus on the management of an index variable that tracks tool call positions. The index is initialized to -1, incremented with each tool call, and reset to -1 in a callback function for handling tool call messages. The modifications also eliminate a redundant declaration of index, ensuring consistent usage throughout the code.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
app/client/platforms/openai.ts	Introduced and manipulated an index variable for tool call tracking; removed redundant index declaration.

Possibly related PRs

• fix: remove the visual model judgment method that checks if the model… #5415: The changes in the ChatGPTApi class in both PRs involve modifications to the logic within the same file (openai.ts), indicating a focus on improving the handling of API requests and conditions related to model capabilities.

Suggested reviewers

• Dogtiti

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
An index hops along the way.
It tracks the tools with every call,
Resetting back, it stands so tall.
With changes made, we cheer and sing,
For better flows, let coding spring! 🐇✨

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2474d5b and 3a96905.

Files selected for processing (1)

• app/client/platforms/openai.ts (3 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (3)

app/client/platforms/openai.ts (3)

280-280: LGTM!

Initializing the index variable to -1 before processing tool calls is a good way to track the current position of tool calls.

---

309-309: LGTM!

Incrementing the index variable each time a tool call is processed ensures accurate tracking of the current tool call position.

---

331-332: LGTM!

Resetting the index variable to -1 in the callback function handling tool call messages and results is a good practice to ensure it's properly reset for the next set of tool calls.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Your build has completed!

Preview deployment