docs(team): document mcp_rpm_limit in update_team docstring - #33475
docs(team): document mcp_rpm_limit in update_team docstring#33475Bartok9 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
UpdateTeamRequest already exposes mcp_rpm_limit and new_team documents it, but update_team's docstring omitted the field. documentation_test_api_docs and code-quality fail on every PR against litellm_oss_daily_2026_07_15 with "Missing documentation for parameters: mcp_rpm_limit". Mirrors the approach in closed BerriAI#33420 (which fixed litellm_internal_staging only). One-line docstring fix; no behavior change.
Greptile SummaryThis PR adds a single missing
Confidence Score: 5/5Single-line docstring addition with no runtime effect; safe to merge. The change is a one-line docstring addition that adds the previously missing No files require special attention.
|
| Filename | Overview |
|---|---|
| litellm/proxy/management_endpoints/team_endpoints.py | Adds one missing mcp_rpm_limit parameter line to the update_team docstring to match UpdateTeamRequest and the new_team docs; no logic changes. |
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs(team): document mcp_rpm_limit in up..." | Re-trigger Greptile
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Keeps dashboard OpenAPI types in sync after documenting update_team mcp_rpm_limit.
|
Superseded: current |
|
closed: docs already on main |
Summary
mcp_rpm_limitparameter line to theupdate_teamendpoint docstring so it matchesUpdateTeamRequestand the existingnew_teamdocs.documentation/code-quality(documentation_test_api_docs) which currently fail on every PR againstlitellm_oss_daily_2026_07_15with:Missing documentation for parameters: mcp_rpm_limit.Context
UpdateTeamRequestand is documented onnew_team.litellm_internal_stagingonly; the OSS daily branch still lacks the line.Pre-Submission checklist
UpdateTeamRequestfields − docstring params = ∅)Test plan
update_teamdocstringdocumentation+code-qualitygreen fordocumentation_test_api_docs