-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 228
Update Get-CodeOwners Logic. #2093
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
chidozieononiwu
commented
Oct 12, 2021
- Consume CodeOwnersParser Logic form DevOps tools repo. (Depends on Updates to Identity Resolver #2085 + plus run of the associated pipelines).
- Seperate team alias from user alias. Incorporate changes originally started in https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/pull/981/files
|
The following pipelines have been queued for testing: |
ed6f585 to
ce54242
Compare
|
The following pipelines have been queued for testing: |
0f26433 to
0132e82
Compare
|
The following pipelines have been queued for testing: |
0132e82 to
1b95856
Compare
|
The following pipelines have been queued for testing: |
1b95856 to
d3e20ea
Compare
|
The following pipelines have been queued for testing: |
sima-zhu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Java will remove the dependency on get-pr-owners.yml after check in daily update changes.
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#24748. We can have a followup PR to output the identity json instead of github identity only.
|
Hello @azure-sdk! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
| inputs: | ||
| command: custom | ||
| custom: 'tool' | ||
| arguments: 'install --global --add-source "${{ parameters.DevOpsFeed }}" --version "1.0.0-dev.20211018.1" "Azure.Sdk.Tools.IdentityResolver"' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are these versions different? We should pull this version into a variable and share it across both of these.
We also can consider combining these tools into one tools package.
| @@ -1,16 +1,30 @@ | |||
| parameters: | |||
| TargetVariable: '' | |||
| TargetUserVariable: 'notspecified' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These should default to empty and if they are empty then we don't write any variable.