Skip to content

[AutoPR @azure-arm-containerregistrytasks]-generated-from-SDK Generation - JS-5780624#37095

Merged
jeremymeng merged 18 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
azure-sdk:sdkauto/@azure-arm-containerregistrytasks-5780624
Feb 14, 2026
Merged

[AutoPR @azure-arm-containerregistrytasks]-generated-from-SDK Generation - JS-5780624#37095
jeremymeng merged 18 commits intoAzure:mainfrom
azure-sdk:sdkauto/@azure-arm-containerregistrytasks-5780624

Conversation

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@azure-sdk azure-sdk commented Jan 21, 2026

Configurations: 'specification/containerregistry/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerRegistry/RegistryTasks/tspconfig.yaml', API Version: 2025-03-01-preview, SDK Release Type: beta, and CommitSHA: '3f223d61b02c0496581dfb71c78104761b448d5e' in SpecRepo: 'https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs' Pipeline run: https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=5780624 Refer to https://eng.ms/docs/products/azure-developer-experience/develop/sdk-release/sdk-release-prerequisites to prepare for SDK release. Release plan link: https://web.powerapps.com/apps/821ab569-ae60-420d-8264-d7b5d5ef734c?release-plan-id=2a608315-60f6-f011-8406-000d3a376cbb Submitted by: clarkporter@microsoft.com

Release Plan Details

…rosoft.ContainerRegistry/RegistryTasks/tspconfig.yaml', API Version: 2025-03-01-preview, SDK Release Type: beta, and CommitSHA: '3f223d61b02c0496581dfb71c78104761b448d5e' in SpecRepo: 'https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs' Pipeline run: https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=5780624 Refer to https://eng.ms/docs/products/azure-developer-experience/develop/sdk-release/sdk-release-prerequisites to prepare for SDK release.
@github-actions github-actions bot added Container Registry Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. labels Jan 21, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

@azure/arm-containerregistrytasks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request introduces a new auto-generated SDK package @azure/arm-containerregistrytasks for managing Azure Container Registry Tasks. The SDK is generated from TypeSpec specifications for API version 2025-03-01-preview (a beta/preview release).

Changes:

  • Adds a new management SDK package for Container Registry Tasks
  • Includes generated client code, models, operations, and helper utilities
  • Adds CI/CD pipeline configuration
  • Includes comprehensive samples in both TypeScript and JavaScript
  • Provides test infrastructure and configuration

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 149 out of 150 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
sdk/containerregistry/ci.mgmt.yml Updated CI pipeline to include new arm-containerregistrytasks package
sdk/containerregistry/arm-containerregistrytasks/package.json Package configuration with dependencies and scripts
sdk/containerregistry/arm-containerregistrytasks/src/* Generated source code including client, operations, models, and helpers
sdk/containerregistry/arm-containerregistrytasks/test/* Test infrastructure and sample tests
sdk/containerregistry/arm-containerregistrytasks/samples* Sample code demonstrating SDK usage
Various config files TypeScript, ESLint, Vitest, and API Extractor configurations
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported

@kazrael2119
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kazrael2119 commented Feb 3, 2026

@CodeJourneys
To fix the ci failure,
you need:
1: add https://www.npmjs.com/package/@azure/arm-containerregistrytasks into ignore-linkx.txt
2: some ci failures may because it has conflicts between main and this pr, you can follow this guide to resolve conflicts.

FYI, feel free to follow this guide to add some real test cases for your service,

@kazrael2119
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@CodeJourneys To fix the ci failure, you need: 1: add https://www.npmjs.com/package/@azure/arm-containerregistrytasks into ignore-linkx.txt 2: some ci failures may because it has conflicts between main and this pr, you can follow this guide to resolve conflicts.

FYI, feel free to follow this guide to add some real test cases for your service,

please follow these step to fix ci failure

@CodeJourneys
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@CodeJourneys To fix the ci failure, you need: 1: add https://www.npmjs.com/package/@azure/arm-containerregistrytasks into ignore-linkx.txt 2: some ci failures may because it has conflicts between main and this pr, you can follow this guide to resolve conflicts.
FYI, feel free to follow this guide to add some real test cases for your service,

please follow these step to fix ci failure

@kazrael2119 - Thank you for the references. CI resolved. Let me know if any further changes are needed

@CodeJourneys CodeJourneys enabled auto-merge (squash) February 13, 2026 05:57
@kazrael2119
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

cc @qiaozha

@qiaozha
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

qiaozha commented Feb 14, 2026

@jeremymeng and @timovv could you help approve this PR as code owners? The azsdk-acr group might be outdated.

@jeremymeng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/check-enforcer override

@jeremymeng jeremymeng disabled auto-merge February 14, 2026 06:33
@jeremymeng jeremymeng merged commit 4db698b into Azure:main Feb 14, 2026
15 checks passed
@azure-sdk azure-sdk deleted the sdkauto/@azure-arm-containerregistrytasks-5780624 branch March 22, 2026 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Container Registry Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. Self-Service Release PR for self-service release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants