Skip to content

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR 12776#36466

Merged
azure-sdk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sync-eng/common-djurek/docs-skip-legacy-onboarding-12776
Nov 6, 2025
Merged

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR 12776#36466
azure-sdk merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sync-eng/common-djurek/docs-skip-legacy-onboarding-12776

Conversation

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR Azure/azure-sdk-tools#12776 See eng/common workflow

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 6, 2025 03:44
@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2025 03:44
@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested a review from danieljurek November 6, 2025 03:44
@azure-sdk azure-sdk added EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system. Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. labels Nov 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a new optional parameter SkipLegacyOnboarding to control whether legacy packages are included in the docs onboarding process. By default, the script continues to include legacy packages, maintaining backward compatibility.

Key Changes

  • Added a new [switch] parameter SkipLegacyOnboarding to the script
  • Modified the $MONIKERS array initialization to conditionally include 'legacy' based on the new parameter

@azure-sdk azure-sdk merged commit bd469b2 into main Nov 6, 2025
24 checks passed
@azure-sdk azure-sdk deleted the sync-eng/common-djurek/docs-skip-legacy-onboarding-12776 branch November 6, 2025 23:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants