[storage-queue] Migrate to core-rest-pipeline#26207
Conversation
xirzec
added
Client
xirzec
requested review from
EmmaZhu,
XiaoningLiu,
bterlson,
ckairen,
deyaaeldeen,
jeremymeng,
jiacfan,
ljian3377,
vinjiang and
witemple-msft
as code owners
| "@azure/logger": "^1.0.0", | ||
| "tslib": "^2.2.0" | ||
| "tslib": "^2.2.0", | ||
| "uuid": "^8.3.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick: migrate to use core-util's randomUUID?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
might do all of the storage packages at once in a follow-up PR, it's a good idea though!
|
API change check APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews. |
|
|
||
| export const SDK_VERSION: string = "12.12.0"; | ||
| export const SDK_VERSION: string = "12.20.0"; | ||
| export const SERVICE_VERSION: string = "2021-10-04"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, I just had pushed all of the storage packages in main to 20 to not conflict with the stable branch until we were ready to release out of main again. We can bump these back down as needed. There's some catch up work before we can wind down stable that Jeremy is tracking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sorry I wasn't clear, I meant to refer to L5 that has the service version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh! Yeah, the queue service hasn't really been changed in a long time, it's mostly on life support is my understanding.
|
/azp run js - storage-queue - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
Looks like I might have to make storage-blob a devdep to clear up the pipeline issues |
|
/azp run js - storage-queue - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
3 participants
Packages impacted by this PR
@azure/storage-queueIssues associated with this PR
Fixes #15813
Closes #15594
Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR
This PR migrates storage-queue to the new core pipeline in the same way that storage-file-share was migrated. There are no changes to the public surface and existing recorded tests still pass.
Provide a list of related PRs (if any)
#26102