arm-postgresql-flexible

[colawwj]

No description provided.

[check-enforcer]

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run js - [service] - ci

[tonybaloney]

@colawwj
The SDK package was generated with PostgreSQLManagementClient name instead of PostgreSQLFlexibleManagementClient (Same for models as well).
Is there a reason why?

[tonybaloney]

I've done some integration testing on this and can confirm it fixes the bug from 1.0.0

[dw511214992]

@deyaaeldeen @sarangan12 Do you know why the client name is changed here?
The original one is generated from https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/tree/master/specification/postgresql/resource-manager#tag-package-2021-04-10-privatepreview
The current one is generated from https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/tree/master/specification/postgresql/resource-manager#tag-package-2021-03-31-privatepreview

[dw511214992]

/azp where

[azure-pipelines]

Azure DevOps orgs getting events for this repository:

• azure-sdk

[dw511214992]

@tonybaloney @DaeunYim We haven't got response from @sarangan12 . So is this PR fine for you? I know the client name is chanegd, but it's generated by codegen and we don't allow to change it manually. I guess there is some changes in codegen side.
If this PR is fine for you and it's urgent for you to release it, we will continue the release process. If it's not urgent, we can continue wait for @sarangan12 's response.
thanks

[tonybaloney]

@tonybaloney @DaeunYim We haven't got response from @sarangan12 . So is this PR fine for you? I know the client name is chanegd, but it's generated by codegen and we don't allow to change it manually. I guess there is some changes in codegen side.
If this PR is fine for you and it's urgent for you to release it, we will continue the release process. If it's not urgent, we can continue wait for @sarangan12 's response.
thanks

@dw511214992 please release this as the current version is broken.

we can work out whether to change the name on the next version, or stick with this name

thanks