-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
ACR arch board feedback #34070
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ACR arch board feedback #34070
Conversation
|
API change check APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews. |
|
/azp run java - containerregistry - tests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdk/containerregistry/azure-containers-containerregistry-perf/pom.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...y/src/test/java/com/azure/containers/containerregistry/ContainerRegistryBlobClientTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| /** Properties of this repository. */ | ||
| @Fluent | ||
| public class ContainerRepositoryProperties implements JsonSerializable<ContainerRepositoryProperties> { | ||
| public final class ContainerRepositoryProperties implements JsonSerializable<ContainerRepositoryProperties> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this done manually or as part of code generation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
manually :( it has flattening and autorest does not add final. is there a way to enforce it with codegen before we support making them final with stream-style serialization?
...rregistry/src/main/java/com/azure/containers/containerregistry/implementation/UtilsImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
afc4479 to
481de81
Compare
sdk/containerregistry/azure-containers-containerregistry/CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Curious: why? Is the Manifest part not implied by the fact that it's on a manifest type? Would you recommend all languages make this change?
...rregistry/src/main/java/com/azure/containers/containerregistry/implementation/UtilsImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rregistry/src/main/java/com/azure/containers/containerregistry/implementation/UtilsImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rregistry/src/main/java/com/azure/containers/containerregistry/models/GetManifestResult.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...inerregistry/src/samples/java/com/azure/containers/containerregistry/DownloadImageAsync.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...a/com/azure/containers/containerregistry/ContainerRegistryContentClientIntegrationTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
f414538 to
187fbf6
Compare
Addresses comments on API view and other feedback points:
ContainerRegistryContent*ClientdownloadManifest->getManifest,uploadManifest->setManifestfull list of changes is in the changelog