Skip to content

Conversation

@vhvb1989
Copy link
Member

fix: #3000

@vhvb1989 vhvb1989 requested a review from Jinming-Hu October 27, 2021 20:33
@vhvb1989 vhvb1989 self-assigned this Oct 27, 2021
@vhvb1989 vhvb1989 added the Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. label Oct 27, 2021
@vhvb1989 vhvb1989 added this to the [2021] November milestone Oct 27, 2021
@Jinming-Hu
Copy link
Member

@vhvb1989 When can we merge this PR? Do we need to get arch board approval first?

@vhvb1989
Copy link
Member Author

@vhvb1989 When can we merge this PR? Do we need to get arch board approval first?

I would just wait for @RickWinter @ahsonkhan @antkmsft @gearama @JeffreyRichter to see this and approve. I don't think in a reason why we should not expose this constructor. And I don't think we need arch rev for this. The functionality is already there for Requests with payload, and it's the same thing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Azure.Core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature request: Core SDK should support HTTP request with request body and non-buffered(stream) response

3 participants