-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Add DELETE API to Microsoft.Security applicationWhitelistings #8368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
You don't have permission to trigger SDK Automation. |
|
@ArcturusZhang @tjprescott can you please review? thanks |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s). |
azure-sdk-for-java - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-go - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-net - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-js - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python - Release
|
| "404": { | ||
| "description": "NotFound" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should it be 204 when we are trying to delete an item that does not exist?
Randomly picked example:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ArcturusZhang done
|
LGTM. Is this PR sufficient or do you still need the other one open with all of the other changes? |
|
@tjprescott i don't need the other one open, you can close it |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s). |
|
Is this a management or data plane swagger? Data plane swaggers aren't reviewed by ARM. @ArcturusZhang |
Well, the changed file is under |
|
@ArcturusZhang @tjprescott what is blocking this PR from being reviewed & merged ? |
|
As this is a management plane change, it should be reviewed by the ARM team first and then the management SDKs team in Shanghai. I'm part of the data plane SDKs team, so the bot should not have assigned the original PR to me. I suspect it did so because of all the changes that were pulled into that (the reason so many people were tagged as code owners). @KrisBash who would be the right ARM team member to review this? |
|
@KrisBash @ArcturusZhang can you please assist in getting a reviewer for this change ? |
|
@ravbhatnagar - are you OnCall now ? can you please review? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
ryansbenson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved from ARMs side
Latest improvements:
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
ARM API Review Checklist
Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.
Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.